NASA: PROOF of image tampering
Top Comments
All Comments (601)
-
for those who dont believe check out the disclosure project. 100's of "official" personnel tell what theyve seen. they must all be liars.... or perhaps they saw light refracting from uranus. lol. also check out delta moon base 1968 video. no way to explain that away. the truth may scare some but to live a lie is even worse. keep up the good work luna, much appreciated! thanks!
-
Tell us what you want to tell us. Show us what you want to show us. Adding this idiotic music makes what you want to say and show less credible,,,even silly. Viewer do not need to be entertained with these forgettable sounds.
-
Still waiting for some "proof."
-
@chopin999 that site is complete and utter garbage.
LunaCognita actually has evidence to back up his claims, that site just just talks a bunch of bullshit that means nothing if you actually read it
-
@LunaCognita To further back up your claim. Its a wide known fact that the technology we have available to us has been declined many years. That didn't just happen in the 21st century. We were probably just as technologically declined than as we are now. (i'm on your side, just stating technology is regulated.)
-
im starting to think Americans haven't been on the moon at all, maybe once, all other missions are big hoax, 50years ago they had tech to manipulate all images and videos, imagine what they can do now, the robots-took pictures of lunar terrain, they had 100mm cameras with fiber optics, but instead showed shitty video
-
@GUARDIANtrooper - Don't give your self a heart attack! :-)
Think how much NASA would love that! Their secret would be safe!.
-
@shumble32 If I have to give it up and get on with my life, why in the fuck are you here contesting this shit? You are the one sweating bozo... I'm not on trial, NASA is, with this fake ass bullshit. Writing, "Could've" was speaking hypothetically, I don't believe in NASA idiotic ass antics, what a fucking joke and you are a full blown NASA Dick Sucker. Now I hit the nail right on the head, at least I didn't suck it like you did Sellout...
-
@GUARDIANtrooper - When you said 'could' you hit the nail right on the head! ('could' is not the same as 'did')
The video proves the images were enhanced (or tampered with if you like). But if that's all you've got you might as well give up on the old hoax story and get on with your life
-
@shumble32 Is it hard to understand if NASA did enhanced anything they could've HOAX everything to look more impressive to the tax-paying public? I looked at things from NASA's perspective and I just keep coming up with the same shit, ANOMALIES... I've done what this person done on this video and put the pictures in my background, but you clowns never acknowledge the anomalies of this HOAX, you just rant on about the shit being real. Nevertheless, people with real sense continues to contest...
@rogermechanica
If you say NASA did not have the capability to digitally process & manipulate imagery back in the 1960s using computers, then you are 100% WRONG, and you have no idea about the declared digital image processing tech that JPL-IPL fully ADMIT they had even BEFORE Apollo went to the Moon! JPL-IPL were even ADMITTEDLY using digital image enhancement tech in 1964 during the Ranger Program! NASA does not deny this! They publicly admit that they had these capabilities back then!
LunaCognita 9 months ago 40
check out aulis.com. we didnt make it to the moon, its a fact
chopin999 6 months ago 2