Rush on Nobel

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• rush

[TreyLutrash]

Why DIDN'T Reagan get the Nobel? It's true; he did liberate thousands of people from the grip of the Soviets without firing a single shot! Obama will NEVER be able to accomplish anything close to that unless another leader enslaves half a continent before Obama's term is up.

[DillonX]

Look at the ranting & raving of Rush & try Telling me he's not on drugs.

He's now just a sick, sad, old drug addict.

[bkhuna]

Rush is not a racist, but take a look in the mirror, Jamal. You might see a real one.

[bkhuna]

Fortunately, I am not here to convert the commies and queers. I'm here to make fun of you. So when a leftist like yourself insults me, I'm only amused.

Don't you have a Hummer dealership to set on fire?

[bkhuna]

I am aware that people from other countries are online. Ya see, there is something called a "dialect". Your English is indeed written as though you are from the US. Not Canada or the Carribean or Great Britain. So when I say this, I am referring to the country that you and I are both in, or do you wish to continue implying that you are not an American.

[bkhuna]

You know oxy is an incredibly over prescribed, and highly addictive drug. So good idea. Let's go arrest every old lady that has aquired an addiction to it, and then worked the system to get more. Or is it possible that their respective neighborhoods are not being hurt by them. Let's send a hundred thousand grannies to prison, just you'd have a reason to include poor sweet little old Rush.

[PrepeiNaSasPw]

bkhuna, I hope that one day you realize that you are neither as smart nor as informed as you seem to think you are. But if you haven't figured that out after 45 years of life, I reckon it's unlikely to happen.

[PrepeiNaSasPw]

Thanks, bkhuna, for yet another empty and meaningless zinger.

[PrepeiNaSasPw]

Actually, "this" is not the USA; this is the internet.

I realize that you aren't that bright, but just so you can learn something: When arguing, you can't just say two things are different without explaining how they are qualitatively different, or that is, different in a meaningful way that advances your argument. That aside, prescription drugs are also illegally sold on the "streets," so your distinction is inaccurate, in addition to being arbitrary.

[bkhuna]

Agreed. Thank you for correcting my bad penmanship, lezbo. Notice that I said a difference in "aquiring" the addiction. Not having an addiction. They are indeed different.

P.S. This is the USA. We speak English.

[PrepeiNaSasPw]

Why don't you non-leftists come up with your own awards and award them to non-leftists whom you admire? Isn't that the appropriate response? If you think that the NPP committee is leftist, then your complaints make no sense. That is, complaints about who gets the NPP would seem to be like complaining that Democrats voted for Obama. Whom would you recommend for the prize? I'd like to hear some counter-proposals in place of complaints.

[PrepeiNaSasPw]

bkhuna: I'm not sure how your name is any better. Mine means something in another language. This is, after all, the "world-wide web." But given that you can hardly command the English language (e.g., it's "O'Donnell" and "lezbos," not whatever you wrote), I wouldn't espect you to understand that. In any event, I fail to recognize the distinction between the two addictions: It's illegal to acquire prescription drugs in excess of the amount that is prescribed to you (which is what he did).