Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

L5K7J1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
31,878
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 1, 2008

Over 200 videos, reshot in HD, now available at www.chemguy.com for just a donation! This clip: Chemguy explains the redox reaction between lead metal in a silver nitrate solution.
Donations welcome at www.chemguy.com

Category:

Education

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bannanaiscool)

  • Which video is supposed to be Senior Chemistry: Redox 2?

  • @tubeuser147 Gotta go to the website!

    Chemguy

  • why don't you multiply the Ag E(not) value by 2?

  • The standard voltages are not dependent on the number of moles of electrons exchanged. You never multiply any half rxn voltage to get a net voltage.

  • I only have one problem, the net reaction's product has a coefficient for the Silver

    2Ag+ + Pb -> Pb+2 + 2Ag

  • Thanks and bravo for noticing that! I did forget to put the 2 in front of the silver metal.

    Chemguy

Top Comments

  • positive enot= spontaneous

    negative enot= nonspontaneous right?

  • i can tell from this videos that you really love chemestry....XD you handle it very well

see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LEO says GER

    Loser Electrons - Oxidation

    Gain Electrons - Reduction

  • 2:53 its even better

    you reverse the sign!!!

  • Listen to how he says r, on the right side gets reversed at 1:30. Its hilarious

  • OIL RIG

    Oxidation Is Loss (of electrons)

    Reduction Is Gain (of electrons)

  • our professor taught us some acronym for red-ox:

    O.R.A.L.I.= Oxidation Reducing Agent Loss (of electron) increase

    R.O.A.G.D.= Reduction Oxidizing Agent Gain(of electron) Decrease

  • yes, AK27 is right. Our mentors revised the original equation to a more simple one. (Ecell-E(reduc)-E(oxi). in that way, students dont have to bother reversing the reduction potentials.

  • why isn't the Ag on the right a 2Ag.. but the Ag on the left becomes 2Ag

  • It is but he reversed it to make it positive so instead of doing .80 - - .13 he did .80+.13

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more