Slaughterhouse Sue

Confused about Horse Slaughter?

Here are the answers:
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/Confused_D1_1_.htm

Category:

Pets & Animals

Tags:

• horse slaughter
• Sue Wallis

[robbiechey]

I do not agree with this as a boost for the cattle ranchers economy. I am a rancher. I know lots of other ranchers. They would never do this to their horses. I am hoping I misunderstood your post.

[azglassblaster]

Sue is a rancher, promoting horse slaughter with other ranchers and the meat industry. All ranchers who would never do this to their horses should start speaking out against slaughter with the rest of us. We have ranchers complaining about their "property rights", that not slaughtering horses is a hardship for them. Please, if there are ranchers against horse slaughter let yourselves be known, like the vet org VEW.

Otherwise Sue claims to speak both for you ranchers and us horse owners.

[ThoroughbredWriter]

"Representatives" like Slaughterhouse Sue Wallis disust me. What does she benefit from her sadistic campaign to reinstate slaughter? Oh, yeah. Graft. Payoffs. Constituents who "ranch" horses instead of cattle, so they can send these DOMESTICATED animals to slaughter, and boost the cattlegrowers' economy. If Slaughterhouse Sue wants to get to the horses of America--Sue, ya gotta go through ME and my friends. And we ain't backin' down. Goodness always wins out over evil, Sue Wallis.

[azglassblaster]

Thank you for commenting, and FYI - she wants to slaughter our wild horses too!

[gentlewomanfarmer]

is her name a 'boy named sue'? she's as ugly on the outside as she is on the inside.

[OhEaghra1948]

Love the horses! They look Marvelous! Unlike that ugly inside and out bitch from Wyoming, Slaughter house sue. She just wants to make money and looked around and said, Yes I don't like horses, lets raise them and kill them. Then she made up lies and those with a lot of money she bought some other congressmen. Now she tells things that just don't make sense. Any one with half a brain knows it's all for the money and the hell with the horse.

[Bevkins]

For those here still drinking kool-aid. Get off your duffs & research the truth. Then realize you've been sucked in like a fool by a greedy, predatory industry that has created our equines plight of inhumane slaughter, toxic meat fed across the globe, all the while paying off our elected officials. Pfizer over 6 million in campaign contributions since 2008, AQHA, The National Cattlemen's Association, Meat processors, feed lots, Breeders Associations and on & on. GREED at our tax paying expense

[Bevkins]

Who ever made this I could kiss you! To manage to take someone as evil, black in heart, greedy, deceitful & of no moral character what so ever & find a way to give us a chuckle while telling it like it is ......remains at the top of my "A" list. Kudo's for a job well done while educating! You lightened the hearts of those out there fighting this undesirable excuse for a human being on a daily basis, while saying it like it is.

[whitemagnolia86]

Someone needs to slaughter the bitch. That's just my two cents.

[Murphygrif]

@uniqueedgings I agree with that point. The problem is, many of these equine-promoting organizations, such as AQHA, encourage breeding them like crazy, knowing full well that there aren't enough homes for them. The more the public is educated about their ulterior motives & the fate of so many horses, the sooner these groups can be held accountable & their "excuse" for slaughter eliminated. Meanwhile, passing the Federal ban is vital.

[MorganLver]

@uniqueedgings See my post above about how equipment designed for cattle is totally unsuitable for horses. I'm tired of explaining it over and over and over for people who run their mouths on a subject they haven't bothered to learn anything about.

[MorganLver]

@uniqueedgings NO, it is not worse than being slaughtered locally. I've been inside an American slaughter plant and it was NO better. Horses are not food animals and are regularly exposed to substances banned from the human food chain. Any you ARE responsible to a horse you voluntarily purchase - keep the horse or find a good home - YOUR responsibility. How do you know "turnover" is about 2 years? Even if true, so what? Because others are irresponsible it doesn't excuse you or me.

[MorganLver]

@uniqueedgings Are you not aware that American horses - not being food animals - are exposed to many substances that are banned from the human food chain. In short, they are poisoning the people who are eating them.

Our govt. has a lot to answer to for not passing a Federal anti-slaughter bill. As for the cruelty involved, did you ever visit an AMERICAN slaughter plant? I have, and they are just as bad.

Why do you call this "culling"? Horse slaughter is a for profit biz, not a service.

[azglassblaster]

@uniqueedgings

No, the Senate has done that by not passing our bill to protect American horses.

Culling has nothing to do with it. This is a for profit business by persons who bid competitively on horses without disclosure, if they were a service let them hang a sign and advertise their services of purchasing horses for slaughter - and stay out of our horse auctions.

[azglassblaster]

@uniqueedgings The study concludes that there are 9.2 million horses in the U.S., 1 out of every 63 Americans is involved with horses.

Specifically, the number of horses by activity is:

Recreational - 3,906,923

Showing - 2,718,954

Other - 1, 752,439

Racing - 844,531

Total - 9,222,847

"Other" activities include farm and ranch work, rodeo, carriage horses, polo, police work, informal competitions, etc