Shah Abdul Hannan on ETV part-3

Shah Abdul Hannan, an Islamic thinker and former secretary government of Bangladesh, discussed in a talk show in ETV about 1971 issue. The one hour program has been curtailed into half an hour into three parts. See other parts:
part-1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siPcRkCuRFw
part-2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwJfXa6uebk

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Shah
• Abdul
• Hannan
• Bangladesh
• Islam
• politics
• 1971
• war
• criminal

[sobhesadiq]

Nice, Lot of thanks to Shah Abdul Hannan. Shareea Kabir is not muslim, he is secular.

[shakilabd]

I can't say that Shahriar Kabir is not muslim. Because he hasn't declared it. But I can say that his all effort is against Islam. Thanx for ur comment

[checkitoutBD]

Alhumdulillah .. the truth is out from the Shahriar Kabir's mouth .. "If we want a Islamic country then why we libarate from Pakistan!!!" ha ha ha .. He is just afraid of ISLAM ..

[mahfuzashraf]

Whats the diff between Journalisht and Hanna as academic. Journalist never dig the authentication of sources therefore Kabir referred encyclopedia which can be modified by any. As an academic, hannan urged for a serious GOnvernmental research thats make sense to a reasonable person.

Mahfuz

[mahfuzashraf]

No comments:

I dont like to make any comments on our so-called journalists viewpoint. They simply take everything on bias. Look, when Kabir was reponsing everyone was clam. It seems Hannan vs all. Funny !!!!

[mahfuzashraf]

Disagree:

The circumstances were different. I guess none of the islamic minded or even we didnt deserve seperation of Pakistan at one stage.Bearing this in mind, our religious party ( if u point on jamat then fine)might have thought to unity of Pakistan, but as soon as the Pakistani army started genocide, i guess jamat begun to protest.

So in a sense, jamat falled bit akward which is as usal for any political party. Just think about, 1991 movement with BNP and 1996 movement with AL.

Mahfuz

[mahfuzashraf]

well, an opposite viewpoints are found and nothing productive and important at this 21st century.

Agree:

its liberation war not civil war, though its not hannan's opinion. For any argument, counter point is preferable. So why not appreciate any counter point of 1971.

[sharifiiucdc]

Mr. hannan shared not only his views but also some important information citing examples from different studies. Not only that he requested all to do the true study, this is the real thing to do. What seculars are doing , doing it from their ill motive. They will, inshallah, be not successful.

[goodluckall]

i personally know many people from all political backgrounds and believe - some from toplevel ------ but i never found a single case from jamaat or related who does not love bd. they all work more than other people with honesty love and for bd. we must admit it

[goodluckall]

once again I said -- he said ----- IT IS A MUKTIJODHHO -- but he pointed some other opinion -- but all news media started blaming him blindly.

ask those who know Mr Hannan personally and and who aorked with him - he is sooooooo kind and soft-hearted person and never attacked and never support any killings. we must not blame him.