GI Joe's Rachel Nichols (Scarlett) and Sienna Miller (Baroness) Interview
Uploader Comments (TheArashikageClan)
Top Comments
-
scarlett looks hotttt
All Comments (103)
-
Rachel Nichols is not justic that she let her own Company movie saw her nudity and sex scene but her fan not?
-
@44excalibur hollywood should not be allowed to make such trash of so many good franchises like they do....but then again its all about the MONEY no matter what idiot will tell you on YouTube about necessary change and different perspectives.. if they want that then make that movie an then instead not give it title of a well established franchise
-
@neloangelo6661 change is good? blah blah blah, is hollywood so depleted of ideas of how to make themselves senseless piles of money they make movies of other peoples ideas..yes should they be allowed to butcher and debase something with a concrete and well established backstory/lore/plot line...no Just look at the nightmare of a movie they made of the Super Mario franchise and my point becomes perfectly clear
-
O god, I would eat Rachel Nichols.
-
Sienna Miller is British?
-
woahh the interviewer ruby rose is a lesbian.. she must want to fuck them both hahaha
-
@neloangelo6661 I have never seen anything about GI Joe's before I saw the movie and I loved the movie 8/10
-
...Alittle pissed when they fuck everything about the franchise up.
-
Everyone going oh just deal with it are a bunch of ignorent pricks okay firstly if it was something that you morons liked you would be bitching and screaming just like we do so say if they rebooted Freakazoid and made him all serious okay you people would be complaining. We complaing because they take are childhood and say well this is wrong I'm 18 been waiting for gijoe movie my whole life my dad is 41 and has been waiting since he picked up his first joe comic as a kid so yeah we're gonna be..
-
Scarlett is hot as hell! I love Jesus.
Jesus 44excalibur. Your all over the place. All I was saying is that movies based on franchises, whether or not how faithful they are to it's source material, are meant to show you a different perspective. You can't expect every story to be perfectly replicated onscreen. Changes are made and there's nothing you can do about it besides complain. Just enjoy it for what it is and stop being so critical about it. We could go on forever giving examples of good and bad movie adaptations.
neloangelo6661 2 years ago
Hey now.. its the right of the die-hard long time fanboys to be critical when some ignorant hollywood types come along and debase and degrade a part of mythical toy/comic/cartoon universe that many have held sacred for years. It's not wrong to enjoy a "new perspective" for what it is, but that doesnt mean that we as knowledgable fans have to accept it blindly without giving our feedback. Plus, WHERE THE HELL WAS THE LARRY HAMA CAMEO? why did it get cut out of the film?!?!?1
TheArashikageClan 2 years ago
wow. you people are complaining about a sensible decision. I understand your nostalgia but seriously things change, life changes. Learn to live with it because there's nothing you can do to stop it, unless of course you want to continue complaining.
neloangelo6661 2 years ago
How the heck is the added unwanted romance a sensible decision?
TheArashikageClan 2 years ago
To all you losers giving me thumbs down, let me say this -- you stand by your 'ships, no matter what!
Snake eyes and Scarlett have always been the G.I. JOE romantic couple, and they always will be, even 100 years from now, no matter how much damage those Hasbro jerks try to inflict on them! Putting Scarlett with Duke or Ripcord will be tossed aside and forgotten as a bad idea, like Joel Schumacher putting nipples on the Batsuit!
44excalibur 2 years ago 5
thumbs up
TheArashikageClan 2 years ago