Richard Carrier vs William Lane Craig (2 of 10)

Some of the responses to WLC's issues with the spiritual body hypothesis can be found here:

On the supposed mistranslation of "it:"
http://www.richardcarrier.info/SpiritualFAQ.html#it

On Philippians 3:21:
http://www.richardcarrier.info/SpiritualFAQ.html#trans-phil

Romans 8:10-11, 23
http://www.richardcarrier.info/SpiritualFAQ.html#romans8

For a list of other scholars that hold to the two body view:
http://www.richardcarrier.info/SpiritualFAQ.html#othersupport

On the appearances in 1 Corinthians 15:
http://richardcarrier.blogspot.com/2008/05/davis-and-faqs.html?showComment=12...

For Jewish expectations of the resurrection:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/improbable/resurrectio...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Richard Carrier
• William Lane Craig
• debate
• Jesus
• resurrection

[BloodOfRayne]

You couldn't possibly refrain from using captions? Craig is already debating one atheist in the video. Whatever objections you have, surely Carrier can bring them up himself? Captions always make me think the poster is trying to influence how the people watching will react to it. Don't rubberneck on debates, friend. It's wormy and annoying. Take up debating and do it yourself directly against an opponent, or don't do it at all. Just don't use captions! It's too distracting.

[tkovrtwrld]

@BloodOfRayne You couldn't possibly click the "off" button like I recommended in the very first annotation?

[writersblock26]

Thank you for posting this, tkovrtwrld.

[treadlightlynow]

The one glaring fact remains that when this "Jesus" was crucified , and there were literally 100's of men named Jesus put to death ...the disciples were running out of town as fast as their legs could carry them . They had flown the scene post haste & were prolly 15miles away & still running . Or so the "story" goes . "Eyewinesses" ...yes of course there were , there was always the women who saw it all , lol...and as many as they could write into the story later as they embellished this legend

[sillynut331]

Craig always sounds so whiny in his debates.

[2nDoppelganger]

@illini554 good

[illini554]

@2nDoppelganger you've got me. your perception is unparalleled. 

[2nDoppelganger]

@illini554 how ironic, you call someone a faggot while defending your christian hero. yay jesus!

[DancingTableLeg]

@illini554 Not baseless. He even gives page numbers. He obviously is confident in his position, but he wasn't not the one debating, so of course he'll add what Carrier left out. Nice way to close a comment. Homophobic slurs? Really.

[SHIBBYiPANDA]

@arturkvieira just turn them off and stop being a bitch.

[illini554]

Wow, whoever made this video is such a loser. I mean, honestly, who actually slips in side comments and baseless assertions while someone is giving a presentation. Someone who will not listen to anyone that doesn't agree with them? If you're confident about your position then you shouldn't have to made baseless remarks predicated upon presuppositions of form-criticism and logical positivism you faggot.

[KittenButter]

This is a very informative video. Thanks for it.