Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Me VS God Part II: God's Image Debunked

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,168
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 26, 2008

A quick debunking of the substantive interpretation of "God's Image."

There is a natural human psychological bias known as the "false consensus effect" that causes us to falsely assume that other people/cultures/creatures/etc have the same behaviors, feelings, or attributes, as we do. I make the argument that the whole notion of "God's image" is really just a natural extension of this effect. God is easier to relate to, and therefore easier to believe in, when God is "like us."

It is very common for religious thinkers to attribute human-like characteristics to God's form. They do this without realizing that human anatomy is the product of an evolutionary history, and that assigning such properties to God only makes Him an evolved being as well. Even the mere act of assigning God a male gender is a dead giveaway because sexual reproduction is a huge driving force behind evolution.

For more information on the nature of gender and sexual reproduction, see CDK007's great videos on the evolution of sex:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_nuacgpo8&feature=related

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AntiCitizenX)

  • Where's part I?

  • @COEXISTential

    It was an old "Noah's Ark" video. See the new one instead.

  • @AntiCitizenX god as a male is not litter-al it represents his headship. Men take charge so we knickname or respectfully call him father him he instead of it. Get it. Or yaweh... His name that freaks are scared to say 4 some reee-son.

  • @DownHavenFilms

    If you don't like it, then go to lds.org and take it up with the Mormons yourself.

  • @AntiCitizenX first 20 sec of this wrong. And the ones who believe that... Wrong. Anyway. Revised? Where at bro? I wanna see this. I looked but could not find.

  • @DownHavenFilms

    12 million Mormons around the world will disagree with you and claim an actual physical body for God.

    The revised Noah video is linked in the annotation of the old video. It is also currently my latest upload.

Top Comments

  • @ceriah311

    I mean really, guy. Did you even watch the video? Or did you simply miss the part where calling God a "HE" or "THE FATHER" is a dead giveaway that you're just imposing a worldly bias onto your deity? The very concept of gender is meaningless when viewed outside of evolution. Gender exists solely as a mechanism for mixing and matching genes within the offspring of a population. Or have you never wondered why there are only two genders as opposed to three or four?

  • This video ignores that The Holy Bible tells us exactly how God wants to appear to us. The story of Moses tells us that God, creator of the vast universe, decided that the very BEST way to appear to appear to mankind would be by disguising himself as a bush and lighting Himself on fire. Yes, makes perfect sense. He wants to be thought of as a small shrubbery that torches itself. That is the true image of God. Perfectly sensible god he is at that.

see all

All Comments (197)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • idiots 

  • @AntiCitizenX "Or have you never wondered why there are only two genders as opposed to three or four?"

    ... I think you just blew my mind there.

  • well thats irony for you, a man who has worked with the likes of Bohm, Feynman, Hawkings and Penrose is now suggesting that we are 3d holographic images projected from a 2d god( 10^123BITS(max.info) existing on our future/cosmological horizon. Sarfatti also claims that our future horizon has a singularity attached to it just like our past particle horizon(big bang), tongue in cheek he refers to them as the alpha and the omega. It seems retrocausality is on its way back, from the future.

  • 4:53 that photo was used by many aryan propagandas and that's bullshit.

  • is God's nose small or big?

  • @AntiCitizenX so fun. they get so pissed but just let-in you know there so much confusion about the simple-list things its re-dunk-u-less. pa-ees out. god with human eyes, thats dumb alright!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more