Peter Duesberg: science vs."hiv/aids"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21,305
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 15, 2008

Dr. Peter Duesberg talks about real science being democratic versus our current system where a non-working "hiv/aids" hypothesis rules and commands all research monies. Clip from Dr. Duesberg's appearance on ABC TV pilot series, "lateshift", produced by Rob Drescher, broadcast on WTNH, New Haven ABC affiliate station on September 3, 1992.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (989)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Google.....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia

    " who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?

    A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials.....and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman) Yet these people say Mullis and Duesberg aren’t qualified to talk about HIV/AIDS because they’ve never done research on it!"

  • @supaflyrobby What I meant...as I told you on another video..... is that you've been sucking up to that pseudo-scientist Seth Kalichman. That guy with 17 million reasons to lie

    google......Sticks and Stones OMSJ

    "and Kalichman ($17 million) are compensated for writing belligerent emails (2), blogging and managing unhinged activists like JTD. It explains JTD’s ongoing support of – and connections with – libel defendants like James Murtagh. "

  • @Darwinianmedicine I agree that all sides of the story should be investigated. I have investigated Koolybabe's claims and almost invariably I find that the papers she cites DO NOT say what she claims they say (damn right lies!!!), she quotes unreliable sources and she simply does not understand HIV infection, immunoassays and the difference between PCR and RT-PCR. The tests tell a clinician DIFFERENT things but, as a whole, they provide a picture of what is going on.

  • @sunaru1 Not to interject on your convo, and I admit I know little about behavioral/social sciences, but I think Kool Aid would make quite the interesting case study for a PhD candidate in psyche (or perhaps an enterprising grad student). I personally would like to see her readout from an fMRI to check out brain activity (used to diagnosis things like schizophrenia). Determining if something is physiologically wrong with her is a logical step one. From there, other options can be explored.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny

    I read that one a long time ago. It is not uncommon for prosecutors to drop criminal charges. What prosecutors have dropped HIV-related charges on the grounds that (1) HIV has not been isolated, and (2) HIV does not cause AIDS. Finally, how a plausible mechanism that explains why PCP was one rare by now ravages populations, even healthy young men?

  • @sunaru1

    So considering the level of blind obedience witnessed throughout the world, she represents a minor case believe it or not. Yes, there are worse people out there! Also, there is nothing wrong with rocking the boat and presenting challenges. But if a person is going to embark on this journey, he or she better be prepared to back up what they say with copious evidence and logic. Listening to the other side would not hurt either...

  • @sunaru1

    What we have here is a classic case of a person being spellbound by charismatic leaders. She does not have the education to accurately expound on HIV-AIDS and is barely capable of reading HIV-denial literature; however, she puts a lot of faith into charismatic people like Mullis and Duesberg. What they say, she will believe in unwaveringly. This is how people like Jesus and other religious figures managed to electrify the masses and spawn global religions...

  • @Darwinianmedicine I am assume you are a clinician. Cast your mind back to your psychiatry courses and please make a diagnosis for Kool'saco'shit/scumbag/f..kyou­'babe. I think she, deep down, knows she is talking crap but believes that if she repeats it enough and strongly enough then, what she wants to believe will become true. Either that or the H she took mixed with puddle water has biochemically damaged her brain.

  • @supaflyrobby Who wouldn't "deny hiv"? Even the "discoverer" never found it in an aids patient. I "deny" flying teapots and body thetans as the cause of aids too. So what? And NO...."denialists" are NOT the ones who write the test kit disclaimers.

  • Google........INTERVIEW RODNEY RICHARDS Why the "HIV Tests" Can't Tell You Whether You Have HIV

    Dr. Rodney Richards, PhD, Biochemist, Founding scientist for the biotech company Amgen. Collaborated with Abbott Laboratories in developing some of the first HIV tests

    To CONFIRM his claims see the test kit disclaimers. The direct links are on my channel under the profile pic

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more