Obama Birth Certificate Layered - Definitive Evidence - Official

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60YI5bx0VtM VISIT THIS LINK FOR NEWEST VIDEO EVIDENCE!!

Is Obamas offical birth certificate a complete forgery?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Obama
• Birther
• Forgery
• White House
• Birth Certificate

[VWState]

Continued..

OK, this means they know what we see, what all can see in a zoomed pdf copy %300 or greater, just moving around..

They release it, looking this bad, so many artifacts that are not consistent..

THERE FAKE, FAKE DOCUMENT, IS SUCH A GOOD LOOKING FAKE, IT PROVIDES REAL EVIDENCE OF SHADY/FRAUDULENT BEHAVIOR..

THIS ID DONE - HOW SMART IS THAT?

UNEXPLAINABLE AT THE MOMENT FOR ME AND THIS IS VERY RARE..

[ShizzleMcBizzle]

@VWState Check out my latest video... very telling

[soundping]

It's called OCR (optical character recognition).

[ShizzleMcBizzle]

@soundping I just posted another video comparing MY certificate to his, and I used OCR when I scanned in mine to the computer... check it out

[kfpok]

@shizzle -- when you scanned your cert, you probably had choices about the way in which it scanned (image, image + text, etc.)... Like I said, I scan something maybe once a year and it's a picture, so this is 10 year old memories I'm bringing up... but you might need to try a couple varieties of how it scans, centering around OCR I think is the best way to exercise or disprove my suspicion.

[ShizzleMcBizzle]

@kfpok Ok.. new video uploading right now... I did exactly that LIVE

[treekingcrees]

I tried this myself using my own scans of documents as a test and it happens every single time you optimize the file as a pdf. These layers are automatically created, there is no conspiracy here,. Try it yourself, you're video is wrong.

[VWState]

@soundping

- It handled the 2nd #1 in the date 1961 differently than the first #1 in 1961

- TWO DIFFENT LAYERS FOR THE DATE FIELD FOR 1961

- MAN WHERE CAN WE GET THIS OCR STUFF.. - None of the factors above can explain this fact only, human manipulation can!

[js7un]

It looks like some sort of digital separation to me too because the background green under the characters could not be scanned leaving white holes. However the darker area on the left would have been part of the green background. I saw another video where that could be moved, so it looks like it was doctored to some degree or another.

[VWState]

@ShizzleMcBizzle The date does not dissappear - only part of it, apparently their OCR that should actually only create editable fields where it is able to, apparrently cannot undserday what the number 1 is in the date 1961 or see that it's the same group of characters as the Other 1961 on the same line..

[VWState]

CHECK THIS OUT!

LETS SAY THEY ARE SO SMART..

That it was released in this form to discredit "Republicans" and Truthers..

Continued next..

[VWState]

@ShizzleMcBizzle

OCR doesn't change it's mind half way through the scan - HIGH END SCANNER AND OCR APPS?????

RIGHT this High End Stuff cannot figure out that the 2nd #1 in the date 1961 is the same character as the first #1 in the date - OR - that the second instance of the same date 1961 on the same line is the identical character set..

It's more like extremely poor OCR Scanner sw, that changes it's mind in various areas around the entire document!

[VWState]

@LedWhisky69 Some of this doc IS related to OCR - BUT there are inconsistencies, artifacts, and manual edits ALSO PEOPLE!

You cannot get OCR or any App to handle some things in one way and the SAME things in another way even on the same lines in cases..