Global Warming Emerging Science and Understanding Part 4 - Dr. Coffman

Eighty percent of the American population now believe that man is responsible for global warming. Emerging science, however, is providing important new understanding of this issue. Yet, this information is not getting out to people, especially to our school children.

Al Gores Inconvenient Truth is being shown in nearly every school in America. Although well produced, it has so many errors that the British High Court ruled in 2007 that Gores DVD could not be shown in British public schools without a disclaimer that it is a political, not a documentary film.Global Warming, Emerging Science and Understanding brings balance and perspective to the global warming debate. Dozens of respected scientists from all over the world explain new and emerging science about global warming.

Designed for High and Middle School classrooms, this DVD and its accompanying resources provides a clear and refreshing understanding to students of this important issue. The DVD is divided up into three lessons with corresponding lesson plans for the teacher and resource material for the student.

DISCLAIMER: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this video is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• dr
• michael
• coffman
• inconvenient
• truth
• response
• carbon
• taxes
• cap
• and
• trade
• global
• warming
• climate
• change
• deterioration
• human
• caused
• co2
• dioxide
• secret
• governmet
• scientists
• refute
• al
• gore
• tax
• hockey
• stick
• refuted
• hoax
• united
• nations
• rothschild

[drkstrong]

The reason why the Singer paper was not included in the 2007 IPCC report was that it was published AFTER the IPCC report. So all they had available, if anything, was a draft peice of research which by IPCC rules is not admissable. To be included in the next report a paper has to have been published during 2005 or before

Lucky the Singer paper was not included - it has proven to be in error. They averaged the satellite data over long periods which would mask the GW finger print (deliberately?)

[coturnix19]

they first show calculated warming pattern and tell us it doesn't match the reality, and then say that it does match observed hurricane decline. So, which one is more correct after all? Pick one!

P.S. great boobs!

[coturnix19]

great boobs!

[Dollarisdead09]

great upload!!!!!