God Exists and the Necessary Law of Truth-telling

God must exist and one inescapable proof is the Law of truth-telling.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• cornelius
• van
• til
• lying
• Bible
• Spinoza
• calvin
• moody
• josh
• mcdowell
• ravi
• zacharias
• sartre
• camus
• ten
• commandments
• false
• greg
• bahnsen
• vantilian
• john
• frame
• scott
• oliphint
• presupposition
• tag
• presuppositions
• presuppositional
• apologetics

[Goddoesexist]

Wrong.

The Laws of Logic are necessary to try to deny this is to use them in that denial.

Only God has the ontological stature to ground the Laws of Logic.

God is necessary.

Turn from your atheistic irrationality and find pardon.

[Goddoesexist]

Nope. Just one more atheistic profligate who must utilize the Moral Law in what he says and in what he hears, all the while attempting to reject it for the immoral, illogical atheistic non-reason. Thus he stultifies himself with his non-theistic nonsense.

[MrDarkbloom]

There is no reason to logically conclude that God is a necessary being.

Necessity presupposes need. There was no need for God to come to exist. That is, God's existence wasn't conditional or contingent on anything.

The only way in which God could be called necessary is if we say that God is necessarily random. What are the chances that God would come into existence? Clearly, the same as the chances that God wouldn't.

[grnmessiah]

Uh? Am I the only one who didn't see that as proving God?

I would have found using the fact that lying is a sin, God wrote the bible, God can't sin, therefore God can't lie to say that he wrote the bible, therefore God has to exist because he says he wrote the bible and he doesn't lie both to be more credible and to make more sense.