Michael Savage on Global Warming, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Barry Obama

2/16/09 Michael Savage debunks Global Warming...

http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• michael
• savage
• weather
• nature
• global
• warming
• climate
• change
• controversy
• perspective
• carbon
• dioxide
• debate
• science
• skeptic
• glenn
• beck

[RichardMNixon]

@BMunich16 Horseshit, Fox News was on a nonstop climategate orgasm. Even the Daily Show covered it. hen most media sources forgot to mention that Climategate was nothing. I need to emphasize that: climategate was scientifically meaningless. It was ONLY media hype and misrepresentation.

Please refer me to a single panel concluding they had cooked the books. The only complaint was that they were slow to disclose their data to public inquiry, not that there was anything malign about those data.

[BMunich16]

@RichardMNixon He, I will give you that, lied about some medicines, but once again, you make a lame attempt to bring religion into this argument. You aren't fooling anyone, even Fox News had limited coverage of the climategate emails. And the several "ethics panels" concluded that some numbers were changed to suit their argument but that global warming is real. Never do they say that anthropogenic global warming exists.

[RichardMNixon]

@BMunich16 He lies about global warming and about medicine. The only way to be more anti-science is to add in creationism.

BS, the media made a circus out of climategate. Everyone heard about the "nature trick... hiding the decline," how you think this was hidden is beyond me. What the media didn't make a big deal out of was the several ethics panels investigating the matter and finding no wrongdoing. They also never gave the author a chance to explain what he meant (tree-rings after ~1960).

[BMunich16]

@RichardMNixon The point of his science credentials is not making him qualified to speak on global warming, it's to disprove your ignorant statement saying he's as "anti science as they come", which is a load of shit. And the media lied? The media covered up the scandal, if you dig into them you find that scientists botched numbers to suit the leftist agenda. He's STILL more qualified to speak on climate change than Al Gore.

[RichardMNixon]

His PhD is in nutritional ethnomedicine (which I agree is a load of rubbish). Read any source he didn't write himself to inflate his resume and you'll see that. Even if you accept his version, "epidemiology and nutrition sciences," I stand by my statement that it gives him as much authority on climate change as a dentist. An MS isn't very impressive and his are still in irrelevant fields. Please research the climategate emails yourself, the media lied to you about what they meant. It's nothing.

[bushstalker]

Have the political , cooperate and media giants capitalized on it to gain leverage , fear and profits. YES! That's what the bastards do! Sensationalize it and spin it to their own ends. Can we believe Gore? NO! Can we believe the mass media? NO!! Their motivations are too suspect. Is it wise to deny the obvious fact that we indeed ARE effecting change globally? Course not. Is it STUPID to assume we are not effecting the temperature as well? You be stupid. I'll take this one for granted a little.

[bushstalker]

K. Mr realist. Our effect on the environment has been obvious as will the yet to be determined result of that effect whether you believe it or not. Acid rain, poisoned lakes, oil spills, coal fires, ph balances in soil and ground water , dead flora and fauna all over the place , air so bad you need mask's like in japan even the color of the sunset due to pollutant's in the air. ALL provable and quite real. Climate change is normal yes but you NEED proof we are a factor in it this time? STFU.

[BMunich16]

@bushstalker Ok, I'm a realist and can see that there is no way in hell that anyone or anything has been killed by a release of CO2 or O2, unless said being was breathing in the substance purely, which isn't possible. And your last statement shows the effect of media brainwashing. This is not an "of course" issue, there is no proof that human actions have any effect on global temperature, read up on the climategate emails you drone.

[PinkProgram]

@BMunich16 it wouldn't kill me because I'm not alive. It would sure as heck kill you though ^_^

[bushstalker]

@BMunich16 Any gas the displaces our air is lethal. Co2 can be mass released in industrially. I've seen this happen. We call it venting to atmosphere cause it disperses fast, but be in it your fked. Pure oxygen isn't great for you by the way and it makes you VERY combustible. A match could make your cloths hair and skin ignite, seen it, ain't pretty. Of course we are affecting global warming with our pollutants it also happens naturally, we must determine the effect of our actions.