WTC 7 Collapse Chandler Debunked Pt 1

This is my first video responding to truther David Chandler's incorrect analysis of the collapse of WTC7.
Note that comments are allowed on this video, unlike those of the cowardly truther in question.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• truther
• 9/11
• inside job
• david chandler
• richard gage
• controlled demolition
• alienentity1
• alienentity

[phr0gpheatherz]

Warning, this is NOT rocket science, if you are smarter than a 5th grader, you can get this easily. The fact is that 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration means that ALL of the resistance under the falling bit had to have been removed and ALL at the same time. This just happened to be the result of chaotic fires, ... Right & I'm the Easter Bunny!

[AlienEntity1]

@phr0gpheatherz Hmm, strawman alert!! Apparently none of the PhD engineers who studied the collapsed and modeled it using sophisticated, state of the art software are smarter than a 5th grader.

Newsflash - you no longer need to spend years at engineering school. Everything can be learned instantly by watching youtube videos. No university degree is needed to engineer tall buildings; no training, no experience.

That's in the alternate Truther universe, of course. Fantasyland..

[phr0gpheatherz]

@AlienEntity1 at no time did I state that you could build high-rise structures with only a 5th grade education, HOWEVER, given the nature of the events of 9/11/2001

+ the lame excuses sorts of explanations given by the taxpayer funded bodies who were supposed to produce scientific reports on the subject, one does NOT need any sort of advanced education to understand - 9/11/2001= FALSE FLAG.

[AlienEntity1]

@phr0gpheatherz Your comments make absolutely no sense. You are babbling without reasonable cause about things you do not understand.

You don't offer an intelligent critique of the scientific reports, just a rather lame attempt to dismiss them, all the while proclaiming that you don't need an advanced education to understand..

I beg to differ. Any boob can make grandiose claims, that's not enough to prove any point. Bare assertions are all you bring to the table... seen it b4.

[phr0gpheatherz]

@AlienEntity1 Lame argument from the NIST, they claim that the destruction of WTC7 could not have been a Controlled Demolition because an explosive charge of RDX sufficient to completely sever one major structural member in the building would have to be so loud as to be heard all the way to New Jersey. HOWEVER a single charge of RDX is NOT the only way it could have been done and so the NIST seeks to dismiss the Controlled Demolition argument by limiting the scope....

[AlienEntity1]

@phr0gpheatherz LOL, I'll tell you what's lame - people like you who INSIST that explosives were used, yet following the truther myth that the exterior columns were cut.....there were NO EXPLOSIONS and NO VISIBLE SIGNS of explosions on the exterior at the moment it started to fall.

So the theory is actually dead. It's a dumb and ignorant idea. THAT'S what's lame, that you're repeating such a dumb idea.

[AlienEntity1]

@phr0gpheatherz No explosive CD in history occurred w/out visible and audilble explosions as the building starts to fall.

Look, you won't find one. Because it doesn't exist. Yet that's precisely what you truthers are arguing for - the utterly impossible.

Maybe in an alternate universe this stuff makes some sense, but not in this one. 10 years and all you guys have are a collection of lame urban legends.

[Oz1976]

@phr0gpheatherz lemme guess...it was ultra secret super duper nano thermite right? And the 100's of 1000's of pounds needed were hidden inside the building by a team of uber stealthy NWO ninja's huh? ROFL.

[AlienEntity1]

@lotilover No explosions of any kind are recorded on any videos taken as the building collapse begins -

Not prior to the E Penthouse falling inside the builidng

Not as the facade descends.

No controlled demolition can do that. Not possible.

Nor was any evidence of cutter charges (required for truther hypotheses) found on any of the steel.

A clown indeed. That would be you. ;)

[AlienEntity1]

@lotilover Not simple, which is why truthers fail to grasp it. No doubt you will fail as well, and will fall back on your simpleminded slogan.

The interior structure began to collapse roughly 7 seconds prior to pulling the facade down with it. So,

1) A lot of structure was broken, and accelerating downward already

2) The building was no longer intact, but was disintegrating

3) Eventually the exterior columns buckled, and a brief period of freefall followed, but not for long.