Is Bible Authentic? Compilation, Transmission & Different Canons of Bible

the video shows why we cannot trust bible coz if has different canons that different ppl made according to there own wish. changes were made when required

and even now we dont have single canon and all these ppl with different canons claim to be inspired by Holy Ghost:) may be holy ghost inspired different ppl differently :D

thanks a lot to brother Sabeel Ahmed for providing this

Christians see the Truth

Category:

Education

Tags:

• bible
• Christianity
• canons
• trinity
• jesus
• samizatari
• muslimresponses

[vasilyjc1955]

The koran was not finally finished until at least 150 years after Muhammad's death and was compiled by memory. In Orthodox libraries, there exists the original Bible and Scripture texts.. The canons and dogmas of the Church were all decided at the Seven Ecumenical Councils. The Bible, regardless of translations. has the same messages. The koran holds no inspiration or revelations.

[xiaahmad]

@vasilyjc1955

stop cracking jokes and read

[vasilyjc1955]

@xiaahmad Yes, get serious and read the Bible., you just might learn to be less ignorant. The Bible does not have "canons". It has verses and regardless of the translation it has the same meaning and message. Your video is far from being accurate and borders on stupidity.

[xiaahmad]

@vasilyjc1955

really ?

then which one is right 73 of Catholics or 66 of protestants? or Ethiopian or some other canon from past?

[ahmalala]

This video only proves the ignorance of certain musims. There never was an aramaic text. even if jesus spoke aramaic it would make no difference at all. They also spoke latin and hebrew in those days. Todays bible translations are based on the earliest manuscripts. Anything added into the text would be well known. The books of the bible as translated today are entirely accurate.

[xiaahmad]

earliest is 4th century

and till 4th century there was no finalized canon even

also at jesus time and after him one or two generations there was no such thing called New testement even

[severnkenpo]

SUX ! first dude, that music's gotta go.... if you can call it music. 2nd, you need to update your facts about the bible, bud.

[vasilyjc1955]

@xiaahmad They are all correct. They all contain the main Gospels, the same messages and teachings. In the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Traditions, those Gospels and other writings/manuscripts that are not contained in the "main" Bible are still taken into consideration in the Faith. To state that the Bible is "wrong and corrupt" is being ignorant. This can be said of the koran, which denies the Crucifixion, amongst other contradictions. The Crucifixion is in the Bible and historically recorded.

[ahmalala]

Jesus and his followers taught the Gospel which is a message. This is all recorded in the books of the NT. It does not have to be recorded at the time it happens. Such was the case with all prophets, noah, abraham, etc.

[ahmalala]

nope, it doesnt