Uploader Comments (mikefucketyfuckfuck)
All Comments (16)
-
sorry but original cant be beaten but love the foos
-
YOU Commenters are a bunch of pussies...great band covering a great band!!
-
@mikefucketyfuckfuck is your name a reference to south park lol?
-
Cleaner production than the Furs original,. However, Richard Butler's voice is a bit sleazier than Grohl's.
-
I never really liked the original song, so it was natural for me to be apprehensive about this one, but true to form, they ROCKED it! :) One of the few times where, in my opinion, the cover is better than the original.
...haha, no offense, of course.
-
@4everClassicrock NO FUCKING WAY. Im seeing them next month im so stoked. God damn i hope your not lying!
lol
-
@DanielAmayaFinn 3 1/2 hours!
-
@4everClassicrock No way! How long was it?
-
@DanielAmayaFinn The Beatles are so awesome, i love them so much, and Foo Fighters! i just saw them yesterday, AMAZING!!!!! show!
And hey Gamez, I'm assuming there aren't so many views because lots of people are unaware of just how awesomely weird it is to hear Foo Fighters do a PF cover.
mikefucketyfuckfuck 6 months ago
hahaha, from what I understand that was know to happen. from time to time. The original (Psychedelic Furs) version is pretty trippy, and I'm pretty impressed the Foo's managed to rock it out *and* keep it trippy. They rock.
mikefucketyfuckfuck 6 months ago