Top Comments
All Comments (209)
-
Not a huge fan of Paul Rodgers, but 2:50... goosebumps...
-
@SigandGibbs Not implying queen werent emotional, theatrical or even melodramatic. However they were not on the nose. Paul is great but the styles clash to me. he goes all-in as well but without the irony and calls more attention to the singing than the song which to me better suits other, possibly more improvisational or rough styles, or styles that heavily showcase "the soloist". I dont desire queen to replace anything. The dramaturgy of these two styles, to me, have way different objectives.
-
@whynottalklikeapirat Er... yes they did. Almost every song by Brian May was very emotional. And Paul is a great fit because they were trying to do something new instead of trying to replace Freddie
-
Great Paul Rodgers!
-
@Queenmaniaco666 yea i thought that too ! this is so good
-
@umbudamidlun I couldn't have said it better myself. Spectacular!
-
Rodgers is just an excellent, smooth vocalist.
-
he is a great singer in his style but that style is not queen. Queen never wore the emotional content on their sleeve. im not being purist its just not a good match.
-
Chuck Norris !!!!!!!!!!
The most beautiful british soul voice of all time, combine it with the most bombastic backing band of all time - you CAN NOT tell me this is a bad thing!
umbudamidlun 6 months ago 13
Queen + Paul Rogers = mystic + awesome conglomerate
Pure pleasure to listening it. Holy 70' when such music was born.
i am lucky i was there
Baud0 7 months ago 3