Re: Kirk Cameron gets Owned. Evolution is a myth!

Video Cam Direct Upload

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• potheadpundit
• pothead
• pundit
• atheism
• atheist
• kirk
• cameron
• banana
• nightline
• debate
• challenge
• blashpemy
• evolution
• design

[kingbushwickthe33rd]

Dude!!WTF???

[peacelf]

@kingbushwickthe33rd Well, that's just what I think abut the whole argument! LOL

Honestly, I don't know what happened, and I don't know how to delete it.

peace

[Tlevids]

This is what creationists hear when sophisticated biology professors attempt to explain evolution to them.

[peacelf]

@Tlevids yeah, it somehow got erased. sorry.

peace

[DragonsREpic]

@peacelf wtf vid is this? is there somthing wrong with my computer

[SanRafaelSwell]

@peacelf

And this idea of a god will die just like the idea of Zeus. What you basically just said is that if certain experiments with the LHC pan out it will disprove god. I agree. Of course something created our universe. According to M Theory it was to branes smashing into each other. What evidence did you give me?

[peacelf]

I just gave you more evidence than physicists had for black holes long before they had "evidence." I'm no fool. I'm not talking about a god that intervenes in everyday affairs, or an old man with a white beard sitting in heaven, etc. I'm saying just as scientists at CERN want to simulate the big bang and black holes, something may have created our universe. The "proof" is that the universe is less likely to have started from nothing. We know where lightning comes from.

[SanRafaelSwell]

@peacelf

Embracing mystery as god? So are you going to worship mystery? That seems even more over board than your regular run of the mill theism to me. Filling the gaps of our knowledge with supernatural things is just plain stupid. Its no better than blaming Zeus for lightning. It is the EXACT same thing.

[SanRafaelSwell]

@peacelf

First you have to show there was a what. Then you can attempt to show there was a who. It is difficult for rational people to accept things that lack evidence. There is NO evidence for a creator of any sort and thus believing in one when there is NO evidence is irrational. No, creation of a "big bang" at LHC would NOT support the creation of the universe by a god. I would ONLY support the current Big Bang model. (cont).

[peacelf]

cont. So, if CERN physicists are successful in pulling off a big bang, and create a mini universe, then that makes our creation plausible, does it not?  I agree that the current fundamentalists' interpretations of "God" has spawned the modern atheist movement, because fundies seem so ridiculous. As a former educator, I never blame people for their ignorance, nor do I discount everything the so-called ignorant say or believe. This is not about "faith" in God. It's embracing mystery as God.