9/11 WTC2 NOSE IN ENGINE OUT.
Uploader Comments (911TRUTHINATOR)
Top Comments
-
Yeah, the fucktards who say this was cgi have never lived. They just buy any dumb theory the internet hands them. CGI looks FAKE. These nerds have spent so much time watching films with TOO MUCH CGI in them that they have lost the ability to tell the difference. Therefore: if you are a 12 year old net nerd who thinks the moon landings were faked, go check out anonymoustruthers bullshit. It's utter shit. You'll love it.
-
@Galv140577 Do I believe there was some fucked up, un-explained events involving 9/11? absolutely.
Do I think there should have been more public investigation, by a mediated third party? absolutely.
Do I think there was more than just planes that brought down the 3 WTC towers? absolutely.
But kids like you, who spew stupid shit like the planes "weren't even real"... make anyone who question 9/11 look like a crazy ignorant conspirators. I want 9/11 truth, not ghost stories.
Video Responses
All Comments (119)
-
You begin by suggesting that, when WNYW upgraded to all digital in the summer of 2001, they decided to use the old cameras (you call them "pre-2001" cameras).
Since the zoom we see in the WNYW nose out segment is a digital zoom (notice how the wtc features do not improve), how do you figure they did that with "pre-2001" cameras?
-
I think more likely the right hand engine based on exit point, but question one is "From what kind of plane?" Many mechanics say a 737 or 747. Question two is "Why was it hauled off to the landfill?" Question three is "What was the serial number?" There are pics of FBI measuring and photoing it. It was an important piece of crime scene evidence. Surely they noted the numbers.
-
lol at this pathetic video THERE WAS NO PLANE.
When a 140 ton fibre-glass & aluminium-alloy airplane hits a 500,000 ton steel & concrete building, at nearly twice the highest phyically possible speed the plane could fly at, does:-
a) The building completely destroy the plane?
b) The building & the plane both completely destroy each other?
c) The plane completely destroy the building?
Watch this video & tell me what you see...
WTC No Plane Truth (Part 1)
watch?v=gBpTWYUgvcM
-
LOL. This video proves nothing. If the engine ejected from the building, it would have been found. The engines of that plane are titanium and I believe are somewhere around 40,000 pounds. If it survived smashing through the building at 500mph, then it would survive falling 80 stories. Real plane, or fake plane, doesn't matter, bc the bottom line is this video is nonsense.
-
@littledickman yea u win! go celebrate ur victory!
-
@Moronkid2485 "Translation: Edge is right! I cant refute him, so I whine about him!"
Edge wins!
-
@EdgemanLL2 okaaaaay...likewise! :) what's the double L for? "loves to lick"
do yourself a favor and kill yourself...if you fail...try it again...dont give up!!!
oh my word i am sorry in screamed
hallnoats4ever 2 years ago
what are you talking about?
911TRUTHINATOR 2 years ago