Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Street Poll: Public Awakens to WTC Building 7 Hoax - Special Report

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
123,320
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 10, 2011

infowars nightly news reporter, Darrin McBreen talks to UT Students about building 7 on 9/11, and ask if they think it was brought down by a "control demolition"
http://www.infowars.com/

(Subscribe to Prisonplanet.tv today!!)
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/news/

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • ten years later and the truth is starting to slowly trickle out.

  • Great video and Alex is going from strength to stength with Infowars. RIP Barry Jennings.

see all

All Comments (980)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This channel is really gathering momentum now. Mainstream media must be getting worried!

  • @Valyn66 I have worked with shape charges for many years give me a crew of 5 one day and access to one floor and I personally could level a building like WTC#7. The only difficulty I would have is security cameras watching what I was doing. Oh guess what George Bushes cousin was head of the security systems at WTC # 7. Oh and guess what he shut down the entire power and security system the weekend before 9-11. For a Internet upgrade. WTF.

  • @Valyn66 "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong." - Murphy's Law

    Maybe it hasn't occurred to you, but nothing is perfect. Even the richest men in the world couldn't have executed this event perfectly. Who knows, maybe it was all apart of a larger plot? You expect us to know the insider details as if we have access to the same knowledge as the people who planned this tragic event? The same goes for the bombs placed under G.W. Bridge, which was only covered once by the MSM.

  • It's just hilarious to me how WTC 7 is treated as some incontrovertible "smoking gun" by Truthers.

    It doesn't even make sense. Okay, I get it, you think it was a false flag attack to justify the invasion (what we had to gain from invading oil-devoid and completely resourceless Afghanistan, who knows). WHY kill thousands of American citizens in WTC 1 and 2 along with hundreds of firefighters and then evacuate and demolish WTC 7 hours later.

    They had all they needed for a false flag. So why?

  • Lately, conspiracy theorist nuts have latched on to the Iron Spherules found at the debris site which seemed to suggest molten steel. Jet fuel, obviously, does not burn hot enough to melt steel. They found evidence of molten steel in rather unremarkable quantities in samples taken for a study by the RJ Lee Group. The samples were collected 3 months after the collapse.

    Jet fuel can't melt steel. But plasma cutting torches can. They were searching for survivors and doing salvage for MONTHS.

  • If you want proof that WTC 1 and 2 weren't controlled demolitions, it's as easy as watching a video of the towers collapsing. They very plainly fail at the point of impact from the planes, right? You can see it with your own two eyes.

    Now what, exactly, kind of a demolitions set up, with all the wires, charges, and det chord, could not only sustain the impact of an airliner, but also sit in burning jet fuel for 102 minutes while staying bother functional and remotely operable.

    Think for once

  • There's a reason the "9/11 for 'truth' movement" has changed its story so many times over the years. First it was there were no planes at all. Well, then they realized that was crazy talk, so they shifted to controlled demolition theories. Explosives, then that got debunked, so they switched to thermite. Well, that was proven impossible, so they invent NANOthermite.

    You guys are so emotionally invested in the notion that 9/11 was an inside job that you hear hoof beats and think Tyrannosaurus.

  • Anyone wondering how WTC 7 collapsed should read an actual peer-reviewed article from a reputable civil engineering journal. "Single Point of Failure" by Ramon Gilsanz explains, in detail, how the design of WTC 7 and the damage it sustained from falling perimeter columns from WTC 1 and 2 led to the collapse.

    I'd also like to hear an explanation for WHY exactly the evil conspirators would demo WTC 7? They already had the twin towers down. Why evacuate and demo WTC 7 hours later?

    For funsies?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more