National Debt Exploding under Bush (pushing $10 TRILLION!)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (143)
-
> If Obama handed out "Stimulus checks" like Bush did, I'd be furious.\
Only financial criminals get them.
> When unemployment topped 10% ten months into Reagan's
> presidency, it was "Carter's fault". When unemployment topped
> 10% ten months into Obama's presidency, it's "Obama's fault"?
> Reagan's solution? Massive deficit spending.
Obama's response is massive deficit spending too.
Obama is the fucking Uncle Tom of Bush you morons. He's no different.
-
.
Hillary claims it was $5.6 Trillion. watch?v=ohNQNtSme_k Her husband was the one who doctored the books making it seem like a surplus when they borrowed from social security.
-
@FreedomInAmerica You've only rephrased what I already said about what a "deficit/surplus" means: It's the difference between the cost of that years Budget and that years revenue. But when you start talking about "$5.6 (trillion?) alleged surplus", you're off in Lala land. $5.6 Trillion (actually $5.2T) was the TOTAL *DEBT* when Clinton left, NOT "alleged surplus".
-
.
Deficit is defined as how much you owe in a given year. Debt is the total amount due. Clinton contributed $1.4 Trillion to our total debt. Our debt clock {usdebtclock org} should be revised to $21 Trillion ($5.6 alleged surplus + 1.4 Trillion Debt + $14 Trillion debt) reducing our $115 unfunded liabilities by $7 Trillion to reflect truth about Clinton.
-
@Nerocification So you're NOT claiming the Republican Congress "balanced the budget" by borrowing from Social Security? You're instead going to continue to insist that Clinton never actually passed a balanced budget because he "added $1.4T to the National *Debt*"?
-
-
@Nerocification That's a different argument. Claiming he didn't run a budget surplus "because he ran up $1.4T in Debt" makes no sense. But if you are arguing the only way the Republican-led Congress "balanced" the budget was to borrow from Social Security, then say that. That's a different debate.
If Obama handed out "Stimulus checks" like Bush did, I'd be furious. Spending money to create jobs is brother #2. Handing out "stimulus checks" is Brother #1.
When unemployment topped 10% ten months into Reagan's presidency, it was "Carter's fault". When unemployment topped 10% ten months into Obama's presidency, it's "Obama's fault"? Reagan's solution? Massive deficit spending.
BI30 2 years ago 6
notice how back in 2006 the tea partiers were just fine with bush's debt. fox news didn't even bat an eyelash
Unclesamslair 1 year ago 2