HHO 7 CELL GENERATOR, INSTALLED IN MY MITSUBISHI

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,514
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 10, 2008

AFTER A LOT OF FIGHTING I GOT MY 7 CELL GENERATOR INSTALLED IN MY ECLIPSE. I WILL POST A COMMENT AS SOON AS I GET MY MPG READING.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (cavebandit)

  • I ment to say kilomiters (distance) you used the car with HHO on? As I want to know if the KOH in HHO production will damage the engine after years of usage.

    THnaks ,

    MIhay

  • @krammchalad

    I only used it for about a year (maybe about 10,000 miles). No damage was noticed. The bubbler should scrub any leftover Koh out of the gas.

  • I wanted to know how much miles you have driven on your HHO generater/engine?

    Thanks ,

  • @krammchalad

    I really don't remember how much was gained with this setup. This was 3 years ago but I do remember that the gain was minimal. This design is very inefficient. Dry cell setups are way more efficient.

  • you might consider not blocking your radiator...it kinda needs air... just saying

  • @kolkid213

    I always wondered why that was there.

see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @cavebandit

    I just hate to see you and others sucked into this snake oil. It borderlines with perpetual motion machines. Your time and hard earned money would better be spent purchasing a WB02 and the software/hardware necessary to reprogram your car's ECM where you can optimize the fuel and spark tables. You will see real and substantial results for both power and efficiency! Most engines are capable of running significantly leaner during cruise but are not allowed to because of NOx outputs.

  • @paulkaygmailcom

    you know what...you are right, these things, do nothing, will never work, and have no practical use what so ever. we all need to just sit around spewing "intelligence" to prove others wrong. thanks for your help

  • @cavebandit

    the amount of oxygen produced by these is miniscule compared to the requirements of the engine. Say you have the 2.4L engine and are cruising down the freeway with your engine turning 2500rpm, it would need about 90cfm of air.. that is 2,548 liters per minute! but you might say but air is only 21% oxygen.. in that case it still would be 535L/m required. Some of the better HHOs I've seen on here produces 2.2L/m.. and that would be 1.46L of hydrogen, and ONLY 0.73L of hydrogen!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more