What tHe BLeeP Do wE (k)now? Part 3 "Double-Slit Experiment"

Double-Slit Experiment - Particles or Waves? - Entanglement

A new original movie compiling the best excerpts from the following motion pictures:
- What the Bleep Do We Know!? (1hr 40m)
- What the Bleep-Down the Rabbit Hole (2hrs 30m)
- What the Bleep-Quantum Edition (5 hrs)

TOTAL: 9 HOURS CONDENSED TO 2 HOURS!!

The Scientists, Mystics and Scholars Interviews herein were chosen based on the expertise in the subjects which they discussed. They do not necessarily agree with all viewpoints put forth in the film. Likewise the filmmakers may not agree with all the viewpoints put forth by the interviewees. Agreement is not necessary - thinking for one's self is.

DIRECTED BY: William Arntz, Betsy Chase, & Mark Vicente.
KEYWORDS: Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Physics, Science, Spirituality, Comedy, Drama, Semi Documentary, Law of Attraction
STARING: Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, J.Z. Knight, Ramtha, Joseph Dispenza, David Albert, Amit Goswami, John Hagelin, Stuart Hameroff, Miceal Ledwith, Daniel Monti, Andrew Newberg, Candace Perth, Jeffrey Satinover, William Tiller, Fred Alan Wolf, Dr. Masaru Emoto.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• What
• the
• Bleep
• Do
• We
• Know?
• Down
• Rabbit
• Hole
• Extende

[doston1]

So I guess the next step would be to discover whether the observer can affect the way the particle/wave behaves. If so, that'd put a whole new paint job on things...

[LightEssence37]

Are you meaning to "control or change" the behavior of the particle/wave? The video shows that the observer does indeed change the experiment by the act of observation. What I think would be amazing is to break that barrier so that the observer could directly affect the particle/wave with conscious intent, and get to a point where the particle/wave could function in either mode with or without observance. I recommend watching the part of this series "messages from water"

[aiklarung]

Maybe God was too lazy to instantiate every atom and just referenced the same object all over =P

But then one celestial programmer caused DLL Hell and the DotBible framework had to be released.

[wallygrl8]

holy shit cakes so that means... i am connected to david tennant and john barrowman! were touching!.. kinda

[DamagedWalrus]

Whaaaat? An interference pattern!??!

[squareatheist]

@hughjoey 2. You will get a wave pattern if you leave the measuring device active but avoid recording the result to a tape. This means the the record of what happened affects the outcome not the measuring device at the slit. This is discussed on the Youtube video "Explained ! The Double Slit Experiment " by Mindrush.

So, Do I understand this correctly or is there something I'm missing? I'd like to see what you think.

[squareatheist]

@hughjoey "This experiment DOES NOT suggest the idea that the conscious observer changes the result."

It does seem that a conscious observer or a physical record of what happened does change the result. The measuring device does not change the result for two reasons. 1. If you put a measuring device by one slit a particle going through the other slit would not be affected by the measuring device.

[foreverfuture23]

Up rd ttjUuuuuj jfgjuhyg gjg hutt uT okkkk oy omit ooooo

[ElectricIndica420]

it seems that we are god I guess :/



[winkte11]

we r 1 :) thx 4 ths

[hughjoey]

First of all this video is extrapolating waaaay beyond the data. This experiment DOES NOT suggest the idea that the conscious observer changes the result. Its the fact that the particle is being interacted with by an observing device. You can believe what you like, everyone is entitled to an opinion. However remember this; the idea that the earth is on the backs of turtles and is the center of the universe is also an opinion.  If you have questions as to why this vid is FALSE feel free 2 msg

[KTK401]

@ebbandflow4614 Learnt is not a word?

[droidhunter]

Mind over matter.