YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Excerpts from 1-A/B "9/11 Guilt: The Proof Is in Your Hands"

Celestine GoldenStar Celestine GoldenStar·15 videos
56
29,749
Like     Dislike 14

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Celestine GoldenStar's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Celestine GoldenStar's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Celestine GoldenStar's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Aug 24, 2006

Excepts from 911 Guilt: The Proof Is In Your Hands, a DVD produced by Don Paul, Jim Hoffman and Celestine Star.
'Making Sense of 9/11/01: Features of Demolition of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers / Opium from Afghanistan as Fundamental to the World's Illegal and Legal Economies'.

A dvd produced by Don Paul, Jim Hoffman and Celestine Star, About a August 2005 presentation to the Los Angeles Citizens' Grand Jury on the Crimes of September 11, 2001
Part I-A
'Systematic Destruction is the Only Explanation: Jim Hoffman on Blast Waves, Demolition Squibs, Straight-down Symmetry, Dust Clouds and Molten Metal as Features of Demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers'
Part 1-B
'Opium from Afghanistan as Fundamental to the Crimes of 9/11/01: Don Paul on How $180 Million in Illegal Narcotics Makes for $3.6 trillion on Stock Markets'

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • jerryb9105

    Yep, they did it! Definitely man-made. 9/11 was an inside job. I'm convinced. Are you?

    · 9

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jerryb9105's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jerryb9105's comment.
  • Alfredo Villanueva

    What is sad is that this evil Bush-government is supported by the far-right-evangelical protestants who are calling themselves "christians"

    · 9

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Alfredo Villanueva's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Alfredo Villanueva's comment.

All Comments (223)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • newsmanbluesman

    Damn I got this - dust equals decelerations. In these clouds, was found the need for a pancake explanation. I understand it has been abandoned. And that Mr Hoffman will have no reward - nor Chandler, Barnett, or USGS person who found spheres. Proposal: block tile experiment at about 1/24 scale - concrete only, w just corner jams to yank from corners of the stack; have it make dust, and - stopwatch.

    In your backyard, you can have a special friend say the words, "Maybe we ought to just pull it."

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate newsmanbluesman's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate newsmanbluesman's comment.
  • VisionXray23

    Have you heared of dr. Judy Wood. She explains why there is so much dust, and why there is was so little rubble.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate VisionXray23's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate VisionXray23's comment.
    in reply to Celestine GoldenStar (Show the comment)
  • JerseyDude79

    Arguably, I can see this guys point about how it "looks" But to assume such a thing is obsurd. The amount of people that would have to have been involved in this cover up is MONUMENTAL to say the least. In either event, the people still died, it is hallowed ground. Lets all do them the respect of remembering them more this week at least rather than argue over the debate on what brought them down. Thank the local hero's near you this week for putting there lives on the line for YOU!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.
  • JerseyDude79

    Yes, no other building has ever collapsed this way. But when was the last time you saw a building 110 stories demolished? A 20, maybe 30 story building might follow traditional collapse patterns (as in the case of WTC7) but even that had a massive structural fire that was NOT seen from every angle. Steel doesn't have to melt to a liquid to be weak, only get soft enough to lose it's strength.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.
  • JerseyDude79

    only because you're talking about 25+ stories of weight pushing down from 1100 ft. It's plain physics. The tops of those buildings were like giant anvils sledgehammering the rest of the building below into dust. The jets of smoke/air from the sides is nothing more than the floors collapsing internally faster than the exterior and compressing the air and smoke out of the path of least resistance.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.
  • JerseyDude79

    Do I believe there was more to 9/11, yes. Do I think that the buildings collapse was deliberate? No. I personally believe that someone in the higher-ups knew of the impending attack and simply did nothing to prevent it. As far as the towers collapse, the impact of the airbus's and the 20000 gallons of jet fuel had more than enough energy and heat NOT to melt, but rather just weaken the structural load of those buildings. Gravity did the rest. They came straight down

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.
  • JerseyDude79

    Okay, I'm not hating on anything to start. But if it was controlled demo, where is the remnants of the shape charges? Where are the beams that would have needed to be cut by an asthetalene torch prior to demo? Basically what you're saying is that some un-benounced team of individuals snuck in to both towers, gained acess to every beam on those floors (including the ones cased in concrete), placed shape charges and the high explosive on every beam without anyone noticing? Uh huh, I see.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JerseyDude79's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later