Obama is George W. Bush on Steroids

Obama=Bush. Don't be a partisan hack. Oh and what happened to the anti-war movement?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Obama
• George W. Bush
• libertarian
• Ron Paul
• liberty
• Obama=Bush
• O=W

[b07rivera]

No I have to disagree with you TokenLibertarianGirl, Rick Perry is George W. Bush on steroids.

[TokenLibertarianGirl]

@b07rivera No disagreements here.

[ThepunksfoodMedia]

@percymiracles23 Obama didn't start them, but he got America involved in them.

[artmv11]

@cjr1881 Brilliant take! So articulate and insightful. Doofus, go stick your head back in the sand.

[cjr1881]

Are you deaf or do you talk like that because you are an idiot? Either way don't quit your fast food job.

[IcabodCrane]

"If you support Obama but hated GDubyaBush, you're probably a bipartisan hack" YEAH!!!! One of the few people I've seen who knows this!!! On top of the fact that we -yet again- had two absolutely horrible people running for office. I've heard FAR too many people who think Obama is better just because he's black or because he's a Democrat or some other nonsensical reason...yet I've seen Obama do NOTHING that would make GDub cringe aside from talk down about the assault rifle ban falling through.

[percymiracles23]

Obama didn't start any of those wars you accused him of starting

[Tzara86]

@mrtundra45 Since you make no blatant observation as to what exactly is FAIL, I'll assume that you're implying that this system of endoctrination and global political control through currency control is FAIL. In which case, I agree with you 100% ;)

[mrtundra45]

@Tzara86 FAIL

[Tzara86]

@voltar99 *abolish banking systems infiltration from government, pardon me.

Our founding fathers' intentions were to have the power with the people. They ensured that the currency creation power laid in the power of government, but that no longer stands. Their intentions were true and good, but what they had in mind isn't what we've come to. I doubt, if they were alive now, they'd care if we had to take a different path to end up at the intended destination. They warned us of this...

[Tzara86]

@voltar99 Just like it is now? Right... well, I'm ready for something new - and not just a new puppet head. Let's not forget what happened to the last man who promised to abolish the banking systems from government (JFK). The only people who get into office nowadays are the ones who are chosen, who will help advance the current systems. Any real change will have to come from the people, and not merely with a vote. If RP is genuine, he wont get into office.

[voltar99]

@Tzara86 No no no. With liberty and personal responsibility the power IS with the people... It's spread out much more evenly than with a big gov. Relying on consensus is not what our founders envisioned. You can call RP lots of things but power-hungry isn't one of them.