Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Judith Miller - The Consequences of Confidential Sources:...

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,098
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 21, 2007

New York Times reporter Judith Miller faced up to 18 months of jail time for "contempt of court" after refusing to reveal her sources in the probe of who leaked CIA operative Valerie Plame's name to the press. In this event for the Graduate School of Journalism, she discusses "The Consequences of Confidential Sources: Jail" in conversation with Lowell Bergman, an adjunct professor at the Graduate School.
Miller is an author and Pulitzer Prize-winning correspondent who focuses on national security issues, with special emphasis on terrorism, the Middle East and weapons of mass destruction. Bergman is one of the founding members of the Center for Investigative Reporting. He spent 16 years as a producer...

Category:

Education

Tags:

Download this video

LICENSE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works).

For more information about this license, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This woman's speech is a disgrace. We have the same kind of "journalist" in France. they are the right hand of government propaganda.

  • Hey, Judy, who'd you romance to find those lies?

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @chidochidochido1 ethics. there is my proof. i believe that if one has no ethics they are a scumbag. thus the comment. i do see what your saying; but you obviously have a big boner for her so i'm not going to take this any further.

  • @good4usoul Smart. 

  • @killeensp So, you insult her for what? For publishing information that is unsubstantiated? It is not unsubstantiated, just non revealed. Ironic, since you yourself posses no information that actually proves that she is "a scumbag", a liar, whatever. I mean no disrespect to you, don't mistake this message, but if journalists don't help to give the power back to the people then we can't call our country democratic.

  • she is a scumbag

  • This bitch has been beat to many times with the ugly and stupid stick.

  • "approximation of the truth" is that what journalists do?

  • Democracy in America? Ha!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more