Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,650
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 2, 2007

George Reisman proving that socialism is totalitarian.

Part 3 of 4.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 30 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (375)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrReco12 privately owned, i get it.

    socialism = don´t build big companies? Oh, ok, lets have only small business. What, You want to have the next facebook??? forget it

  • @trifulquita15

    LOL, are you as dumb as you appear to be.

    Capitalist: means of production are privately owned Idiot, privately owned. 

  • Perfect summary of what I lived under.

  • Hitler destroyed the worker unions so could not be socialist, he also barred universal health care to non aryan.

    In conclusion he has his facts wrong

  • @MrReco12 But they were both collectivist, right?

  • @trifulquita15

    Soviet Union was socialist whilst Nazi Germany wasn't!

    Your an idiot!

  • @HammerOvThor

    It's a tricky conundrum, because Left Libertarianism emphasizes localized egalitarian efforts, which on the one hand emphasizes the self-ownership of workers but simultaneously weakens the self-ownership of capital holders. A good example of the system in action would be a democratic workplace, such as a co-op. Whether or not protecting one group's self-ownership at the expense of another's self-ownership can be counted as Libertarian is the heat of the conundrum.

  • @SocialistCatgirl Thanks, I will. From where I stand now, and from what I know, you can't really have a "left libertarian". A libertarian believes in the first principal of personal liberty, and once you establish that you believe in that, you have in effect subscribed to believe a certain way about individual issues. To be a left libertarian would render your first principal inconsistant and thus your belief a fallacy.

  • @HammerOvThor

    Well, it wouldn't really be fascism if the government was taking initiatives that were not to the entire population's liking. Under such a definition, every government across the globe is Fascist. Fascism is a system where you hold the state as the ultimate ideal and marry industrialism to autocracy. Its heavy emphasis on nationalism tends to lend itself well to totalitarianism.

    There are libertarian variants of Socialism you might like. Left Libertarianism is worth a look.

  • @SocialistCatgirl I acknowledge that their are discernable differences, but from my strict libertarian standpoint, I see them as only valuable if every last person is in full consent of the socialist measures. If one single person does not consent to his property being taken from him, it's fascism. You're arguing price, not principal.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more