Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Colosseum 2005 theme for an imaginary western Chris Farlowe

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
30,820
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 28, 2007

Colosseum Live 2005 - no jack bruce, no mountain | theme from an imaginary western | Chris Farlowe and Mark Clarke on vox | Barbara Thomson on sax (R.I.P. Dick!)

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (0xym0r0nized)

  • Why isn't farlowe singing the main chorus? the other singer sucks.

  • Probably because his voice is aging... But Mark and him sing together at 4:20 which I think is the best part of the recording!

  • for the forest!!!Chris makes me feel shivers

  • I love the part at 4:20 when Chris and Mark sing together...

Top Comments

  • Mountain's Woodstock version is less impressive than Colosseum's Daughter of time version of "Theme...." Sax's very good, but I prfer the 1994 version which is closer to the 1970 I heard and saw in Plumpton, UK. Thank you, Colosseum.

  • Yeah, and because he's so bad he was allowed to sing the high parts on Uriah Heep's "The Wizard". Does the term "different" mean something to you?

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm not particularly taken by any version of this number. Early Colosseum and Mountain were both great innovative bands.

  • On the road again: 02.07.10 Vienna / 23.10.07 Berlin / 29.10.07 Hamburg / 09.11.10 Nürnberg / 12.11.10 Innsbruck / 14.11.10 Budapest and some other gigs in Austria, Germany and Czech Republic -> for the forest ....

  • Wow, that's fantastic!!! I couldn't believe ...Impossible to compare with the Mountain one, two different thing...two WONDERFUL different things..THANKS for sharing I LOVE IT!!

  • As dreadful as your taste in music -

    or even more dreadful?

  • "different" is obvious. "DREADFUL" is far more specific.

  • Come on guys, take it on face value, Its a great version! could we do better? I don't think so! Awsome sax, Dick would be proud.

    To the knockers, have some respect, there are too many 'bedroom critics' & I'm sure they will, at some point, send a vid of themselves to show how 'it should be done'

    Untill then my friends...... 'Wind your necks in'

    Peace & everything else!

    G

  • Not heard a sax' on this before. come on guys, it's a nice cover of a JB classic. Lots of passion.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more