Evolution: Where's the missing link? (Ayrshire recording studio)

You miss his next point

In all fairness, I should add that another discussion says chimps have a version of PGML/FOXD/CBWD genes in chromosome 9. If so, my agrument is not as strong.

Your argument isn't strong anyway, but it's good to see you bring this argument to the table.

My prediction is that when hominid DNA is analyzed sufficiently, it will be discovered that some intermediate species, probably australo-whatever, will have 3 strings of PGML/FOXD/CBWD . Two from humans, one from apes, proving they are hybrids.

I don't know much about PGML/FOXD/CBWD. I've tried researching, but can't find much other than the wiki article.

Can you give a more detailed explanation of why if it has 3 strings of PGML/FOXD/CBWD it must be a hybrid?

In my discussion with majorvoltage on his video 'Human Evolution: The fossil record' he states
Those genes long predate the human-chimp split. FOXD4 for example, a copy of which is on the fusion site, is conserved in bilateria. Even C. elegans has it

Only humans have the genes in 2 chromosomes. If hominds had 3 strings it would be 2 from human and one from ape.

If this was found in "australo-whatever", it could well be the case that our common ancestor with the "australo-whatever" had developed these genes before the split with us and then the "australo-whatever" had developed one more copy.

Yours isn't the only option, so this wouldn't constitute as proof of your position...if it was ever even found.

If the australo- had these genes in part of chromosome 2, it would have two of chromosome 2 and therefore have 4 strings like a human.

Again, I don't know much about PGML/FOXD/CBWD, but I'm sure if more copies were found in the intermediate than in humans, it could be attributed to them having developed these genes before the split with us and developing one more after.

If, however, they are found to have less copies than us, this also fits with them being an intermediate between us and our common ancestor with chimps.

I don't see where else your argument has to go.

If australo was a non-hybrid, it would either have 2 rows of the genes like an ape or 4 rows like a human.

In 10 or 15 years when they find 3 rows, remember you heard it hear first.