Darwin's Amazing Failsafe Test Taking Machine, Part 1
Uploader Comments (BroCope)
Top Comments
-
FAIL. So Very Fail.
Even if you are offering to shit gold bricks for me, You are a creepy old dude dressed in less than flattering attire. And to top it all off, you're shouting at young people.
It isn't any wonder that you are being ignored.
I'm surprised that the cops weren't called.
All Comments (44)
-
@BroCope You aren't worth the time and effort I am using right now to ridicule you for addressing a year old comment.
-
Oh right.. you define postdoctoral experience as sitting outside campuses spouting bullshit! I didn't realise that... in that case I guess you do have over 30 years of postdoctoral experience... hahaha imbecile!
-
Here we go again. You are not well educated and you do not have any post doc experience. You just copy pasted things about CP violations without even knowing what it all was... you misunderstand science and critisize the misunderstanding. You claimed CP violations explain the matter antimatter problem (WTF?!) - you are a complete and utter liar. That's the worst thing, you trot out these "I am educated" claims to try and give credence to your bullshit, you are nothing but a lying hypocrite!
-
Gotta point out that bearing false witness is a sin, BroCope.
You are seriously screwed if god exists, and punishes people not based on what they believe, but on what they accepted based on it's voracity. He gave us reason, try to exercise it at SOME point in your life.. since so far you've shown yourself to be literally deluded by your christ-psychosis.
@infinity730 It is just that it took me a year to run out of interesting things to comment on, and be reduced to responding to numbskulls.
BroCope 1 year ago
Evolution is based on multiple lines of evidence. Fossils, difference in DNA, parallel evolution of organisms compared to their parasites, just 3 examples. Scientific theories are constantly tested through diverse scientific fields.
There are many things of evolution not well understood, such as accelerated regions of differences in a genome (ie HAR genes) and function of the epigenome. However, that is no evidence that there is a God.
robertmike57 2 years ago 3
@robertmike57 That is a nice story, but not true. Ask yourself whether those who told you were dedicated to the evolutionarey explanation. Do you think for one minute they would tell YOU of the MYRIADS OF PROBLEMS, UNASWERABLE PROBLEMS with the so-called theory. What a bunch of fairy tales. You need to ask questions, not just swallow what is force fed to you.
As for evidence for God? Notice that one of the central themes of "science" is to try to explain why the apparent design really
BroCope 1 year ago
@robertmike57 isn't design at all. Evolutionist always admit to the evidence of God, but then are forced to try to explain it away. Poor morons. When you can point to any complex design that is demonstrably the result of random destructive forces, then I will believe your your fairy tale. Don't cite anything from evolution. You can not use the thing you are trying to prove to prove the thing you are trying to prove. That is called a circular proof, and is a logical fallacy.
BroCope 1 year ago
BroCope, ignorance of a scientific subject is not an argument against it, no matter how much you wish it is.
infinity730 2 years ago 2
@infinity730 Yes I kinow. It is the shortcoming of every proponent of evolution I have ever debated. As for me, it is a subject I have studied, AT GREAT DEPTH, for close to four decades. I was educating myself when your parents were screwing on junior prom night,
BroCope 1 year ago