Logical Puzzles
Loading...
2,337
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (4)
-
This is why i love Alice in Wonderland. And in turn Lewis Carroll.
-
@kdmq Yes, but as q implies p, if not q, then not p as well.
Essentially, q cannot exist without p and vice versa so (not q and p) is the same as (not p and not q)
-
The statement in the text says "...Or it's impossible that both Pablo Picasso did not paint potted palms and that Pamela Potter's porridge is putrid. That seems to state NOT(NOT Q AND P) You expressed it as NOT(NOT Q AND NOT P). Isn't that a logic mess up?
Loading...
My brain just fell out.
Libervurto 1 year ago 7