Should we baptize "in Jesus' name" or not?

We should baptize by the authority of Jesus in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as Jesus commanded in Matthew 28:19.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• baptism
• salvation
• oneness
• pentecostalism
• pentecostals
• only
• movement
• acts
• 2:38
• 10:48
• 19:5
• 3:1
• 16:18
• corinthians
• 5:4-5
• 6:11
• Ephesians
• 5:20
• Thessalonians
• 3:6
• authority
• church
• of
• christ
• apostles
• united
• matt
• slick
• www.carm.org

[bigtoelittlelue]

You need to Repent !!!! And be baptized in JESUS name  I'll help you

[bigtoelittlelue]

People like you pervert The Lord Jesus word. Out of your own mouth you confessed his Name it is very apparent that you are spiritually ignorant. Biblically undiscern !!!!!!!!!!!

[faithbringshope]

not only is the actual one God baptism in Jesus name evident everywhere in scripture, including Mat 28:19 because the one name of the Father, son and holy ghost is JESUS so this is why all the other scriptures say to baptize CALLING on the name of the Lord Acts 22;16. the apostles understood their God to be one and not a trinity God. they only called on Jesus name in baptism and history books and encyclopedias have recorded the entire event when the Roman church changed the baptism from Jesus

[faithbringshope]

Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:

"The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century."

[faithbringshope]

Wilhelm Bousset, Kyrios Christianity, page 295:

"The testimony for the wide distribution of the simple baptismal formula [in the Name of Jesus] down into the second century is so overwhelming that even in Matthew 28:19, the Trinitarian formula was later inserted."

[faithbringshope]

Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:

"It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but...a later liturgical addition."

[faithbringshope]

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, page 2637, Under "Baptism," says:

"Matthew 28:19 in particular only canonizes a later ecclesiastical situation, that its universalism is contrary to the facts of early Christian history, and its Trinitarian formula (is) foreign to the mouth of Jesus."

[faithbringshope]

The Jerusalem Bible, a scholarly Catholic work, states:

"It may be that this formula, (Triune Matthew 28:19) so far as the fullness of its expression is concerned, is a reflection of the (Man-made) liturgical usage established later in the primitive (Catholic) community. It will be remembered that Acts speaks of baptizing "in the name of Jesus

[faithbringshope]

Acts 10:48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the (one) name of the (one) Lord.

Acts 19:5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

Acts 22:16 'And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the (one) name of the (one) Lord.'Acts 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.

[faithbringshope]

Acts 8:12 But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized.

Acts 8:16 For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptized in the(one) name of the Lord Jesus.