Noam Mohr and the Internet Skeptic on Global Warming

In this discussion Dr. Noam Mohr (Physics Yale / U of Penn) a staunch supporter of the global warming theory as well as kindness to animals goes over the science behind the global warming theory with Bob Wagner, the Internet Skeptic. This discussion was casual after the formal shoot where the two scientists "let their hair down". What is important is not agreement but recognition from both sides of the value of discussion and empowerment of the masses through understanding Mother Nature and the great gift of life we all share on this planet.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• noam
• mohr
• internet
• skeptic
• global
• warming

[ash4432]

skeptics stop saying that C02 drives tempature. the science is not its raising the tempature its throwing off balanced...

[paulagloria]

so you agree that CO2 is irrelevant to temperature rise?

[camcheck]

Can you read a graph ??? Google-- Carboniferous climate - and check it out..

[camcheck]

TO bad he is right. Just google - Carboniferous climate - and check the graph part way down...........

[Kumenonhihah]

Every man has the responsibility to find out the truth for himself. The fact that he is a businessman is irrelevant. He presents valid arguments, it doesn't matter if he were a monkey, his arguments stand on their merits So test the merits of his arguments, and quit worrying if he is an "expert" or not.

[StrawmanLogic]

DISCLAIMER: This guy teaches business classes at Devry. Now he's on the Internet giving his opinion on an area of science for which he holds no degrees nor has he published any peer-reviewed papers. He also ran for congress in Ohio. How did that work out?

[nfoo]

I want to save money and use all the energy I want:

So give me cheaper energy, made by new, cleaner technology.

But don't tell me to "save" energy and go back to stoneage.

How can you want people to cut down their energy use?

It won't happen. India, China etc. don't care a shit.

And they shouldn't.

Nobody should have to worry about their energy consumption.

It's simply the wrong way to tackle the problem, if their is one at all.

Give us new technology, Not Solar and Wind. And no guilt.

[ash4432]

thank you very much tell these skeptics that beat into there heads

[jffryfnt]

Well you know, patents do expire, at which time they are free for anyone to exploit. Did you know that all patents registered in the US are free for everyone to peruse. Then only exception is that you can't use it for commercial purposes. So what's stopping you? By the way, I think I've heard of this. You don't get something from nothing. Much energy is expended to get a vacuum, you can't get more out than you put in it.

[paulagloria]

check out a patent issued to a man in Mansfield Ohio in 1871 that brings energy from the vacuum...is it right that a patent that could solve our energy crisis (and I bet there are many others) should be buried? thx for being so observant