Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

National Oratorical Contest American Legion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,287
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 23, 2009

This is Spencer Harjung, the 2008 winner of the American Legion National Oratorical Contest. The 2009 contest will be held April 18-19 in Indianapolis, Indiana and a new champion will be selected. This is a fantastic program with some great scholarship money available. You really should give this contest a try if you're looking for a way to earn a college scholarship.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I liked his point. I aslo like his ability to expand on such a small topic. I think he did fabulous.

  • I can tell he did a lot of research... He did a good job. (:

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nobreakfastinhel1 its supposed to be speech, not SPEACH! just trying to be honest :)

  • I LOVE IT SO MUCH.......

  • This speach is amazing. My american legion speach is nothing compared to this. This video really helps me see what the judges want to see in a speach, and the speaker.

  • @adco209 I'm sorry; I must have let that bit slip. The Articles did have "guidelines," if you could call them that. They consisted of a sentence or two in which the need for a unanimous decision was described. However, Harjung won because he gave an amazing oration, and that can't really be contested. I say that, despite his bit about the Articles, his speech was impeccable.

  • @jasonkim112 Harjung said, "The Articles had no guidelines for an amendment process." That is not an evaluative statement about the ease of such a process, but a denial of its existence.

  • @adco209 Yes, they did; however, one of the greatest flaws of the Articles of Confederation was that they were nearly impossible to amend because amendment required a unanimous vote. In fact, the original purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to attempt this. Even in the decade following the American Revolution, the United States was not truly a united nation. As Harjung mentioned, states were unfairly taxing other states and there was no clear direction of national intent in any matter.

  • im actually joining the regionals for this contest.

  • im actually joining the regionals for this contest....

    i don't think ill be that good though.

  • How did this guy win? He had a factual inaccuracy! The Articles of Confederation had explicit guidelines for amendments to the document.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more