Bill Nye uses facts to debunk astrology.
Top Comments
All Comments (80)
-
He doesn't debunk anything - he just doesn't understand. The zodiac is based on the seasons whereas the Sidereal zodiac is based on the consellations which is more in line with astronomical fact. Do your own research. Otherwise you're just a materialist dogmatist.
-
Fact is that astrology doesn't rely on constellations which are, again, imaginary bodies made by human minds... So, the whole video is a waste since the person never studied nor learned astrology deeper than constellations which he reassembled to the Zodiac signs. Truth is, Zodiac signs are only named after some of the constellations, but are in fact insignificant due to the fact that astrology relays on elements. So, haha, nice try
-
Bill Nye said sexy. EPIC.
-
Facts will never debunk superstition.
-
Haha, sexy indeed.
-
It's aload of bollocks!
-
@piip4 true, but the morons that believe this shit will still argue for it
-
@sanitydotorg "please explain the glastonbury zodiac" Thus: badarchaeology(dot)wordpress(d
ot)com / tag / glastonbury-zodiac -
@sanitydotorg - "Millions of people use astrology but not one person has demonstrated it works" A Peenum
-
No thanks. If that's the best you can do intellectually, you're not someone who I would want to sleep with.
Since when did you need facts to debunk astrology? You only need a working mind. That's like using facts to debunk why 1+1 doesn't equal cupboard.
piip4 1 year ago 110
I think the biggest mark against Astrology is the fact that if you were to give the birth date, time, and location (and any other supposedly relevant information to ten different asstrologers (yeah, misspelling intentional), you would get ten different "readings".
IT"S NOT EVEN INTERNALLY CONSISTENT!!!
steveb0503 1 year ago 8