SA@TAC - Mark Levin's Constitution

Nationally syndicated radio talk show host and bestselling author Mark Levin's argument that the Constitution does not require the President to consult Congress concerning foreign interventions resembles the Left's argument concerning the constitutionality of Democrats' domestic interventions.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Southern
• Avenger
• The
• American
• Conservative
• Jack
• Hunter
• Mark
• Levin
• Thomas
• Woods
• Constitution
• War
• Powers
• Article
• Obama
• Libya
• neoconservative
• Nancy
• Pelosi
• James
• Clyburn
• Obamacare
• Social
• Security
• Medicare

[artfulhogster]

@JIMMYEDSEL Neocons and libs have a lot in common. Neocons will usually ignore the Constitution when it's convenient for their big government polices and foreign nation intervention. The libs ignore the Constitution when it's convenient to propagate their multitudes of statist programs. Both are wrong.

[Taephon999]

@smunro44 Because Levin knows he'd be humiliated.

[TheWizzooo]

@CCMochi get bent turkey

[CCMochi]

@TheWizzooo

Like I said Wizz, a cheap one liner - which is all you got. And a foul language one at that. Really makes you look tough -

[TheWizzooo]

@CCMochi Nice strawman. You fucking pussy.

[CCMochi]

@TheWizzooo

Sure he can. As it pertains to the topic at hand, what would you have the tomes of documents that lead up to our nation's founding distilled down to - a cheap one-liner, say like: 'Kill em all, let Gawd sort em out'...? Would that be 'manly' enough for you?

[TheWizzooo]

@CCMochi If a man can't say it in a few words then he can't say it.

[1976donzi]

Fuck the bald little draft dodger. Line for waterboarding starts right behind fat pig rush. Fall in Markey Boy!!!

[CCMochi]

- defending foreign policy actions that have no bearing or ties to Constitutional precept or spirit, hence Mark Levin types twisting in knots and slinging mud, instead of debating the facts. Indeed, men like Thomas E. Woods end up in the slightly embarrassing position of making Mr. Levin types look - well, rather silly...

Then again, Mr. Levin is radio theater of sorts - with all the hype & hysterics associated with the genre. It's simply unfortunate that he makes it out to be 'serious'.

[CCMochi]

- the 'conservative movement' would always be able to rely on the Military as a stalwart and faithful component of our Republic. What the conservative movement has missed however, is the fact that our Military is but an _extension_ of bureaucratic waste and burgeoning Power where none is needed or wanted - domestically or internationally...

Thus, backed into a corner of trying to explain the aforementioned drift away from true Constitutional moorings, the Neo-Con faction finds itself (cont.)

[CCMochi]

- became a HUGE disappointment for the 'conservative' movement, save for the Military. Follow me along here... With 09/11 front & center, at least the conservative movement had the Military to 'rely on', as perhaps the last bastion where 'faith in government' could be placed by those disillusioned with either policy failures, or policies that were outright contrary to conservative precept in other areas, save for our Military adventures.

In other words, if all else failed (continued)

[CCMochi]

@southernavenger: If you will allow me...

The position of a Mr. Levin needs to be understood, for there is an answer to the seemingly unanswerable 'conservative' position men like him take regarding matters of Constitutional importance, with particular attention to Foreign Policy.

- Faith in government from the 'conservative' position; its role & actions regarding Liberty, has been on the wane at least since Reagan left office, perhaps much further back.

The election of W. Bush (continued)