Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Debate: Moral Relativism v. Moral Absolutism - Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,475
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 21, 2010

Firestone vs. Gomberg in a debate on Moral Absolutism versus Moral Relativism.
Part 1: Firestone

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Studying this for the semester, interesting..

  • I am finding it disturbing that this "Part 1" has excluded the professors statements. Kinda hard to judge this without hearing the unrepresented professors statements!

  • Where was this held? It looks like a college.

  • @SteinUndStahl666 If we allow for the rates of killing in a particular society to exceed the birth rate, then that society will eventually die out. Some principles must be deemed immoral by the society for the preservation and well being of the said society.

  • @hesster31

    So who gets to decide what is moral? You?

  • Actually just because someone disagrees with a moral absolute, that doesn't make that absolute principle wrong. If string theory exists, it doesn't matter whether we agree with it or not. It exists regardless. Absolute morals are absolute because they are independent from human opinion.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more