9/11 WTC Meteorites Molten Iron Concrete

Images corroborating the high temperatures and the molten iron/steel at the macro scale.

Taken from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yirBP13hU

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9nE372Ymc4

Related:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5q5ggaGGpdc

At the micro scale we have found microns of droplets of molten iron/steel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsoLm66lEUQ

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9/11
• WTC
• Meteorites
• Molten
• Iron
• Concrete

[danp5648]

@biosemiotician yep I know. I believe since the filming of nano super-thermate was filmed on the pile by Kurt S. that the heat and aftermath was thermate reacting. Have you seen the Kurt sonnenfeld video? However thermate can do anything you want it to do. I just watched the full 22 minute interview Danny Jowenko and found a lot of faked Danny Jowenko TY videos and watched  WTC Debate Chris Mohr vs. Richard Gage. Gage only uses 1 of 3 WTC 7 witnesses but talked about the still missing.

[biosemiotician]

@biosemiotician At 'Veterans Today', Tom Mysiewicz concludes that: "Only nuclear demolition could have accomplished what was done; the placement of tens of thousands of high-explosive charges would have been impossible!"

[biosemiotician]

@biosemiotician Mysiewicz adds:A lot of that mass simply disappeared into the dust that covered lower Manhattan.Why was it so important to get rid of the WTC steel QUICKLY? Could it be because nuclear detonations changed the isotope ratio in the steel? All iron of terrestrial origin has a set ratio of Fe isotopes with very long half lives–Fe-56, Fe-57, Fe-59 and Fe-60. (Meteorites and steel from nuclear blasts and space has a different ratio.)

[biosemiotician]

@danp5648 Tom Mysiewicz says: The nano-thermite only accounts for the softening/cutting of steel structural elements. It does NOT account for: 1) the huge amount of dust <10 microns–detected by organizations such as USGS, characteristic of demolitions, 2) the simultaneous pulverization of 500,000 fluorescent lighting fixtures, releasing substantial amounts of mercury into the environment, 3) a 50-foot debris pile rather than a 50-story-high MOUNTAIN of debris with collapsed ceilings + furniture

[danp5648]

@biosemiotician I am adding all your comments to my last video where you can see this super-thermate actually burn on the WTC 7 pile days after high pressure water was used on it and days and nights of hard driving cold rain and the stuff still burns bright. You don't even see the source material and it makes no sound. This is in my option the next smoking gun video after the photo of the blue logo plane videos.

[biosemiotician]

@danp5648 PM received: "It seems that the Mossad II organizers of that heinous black operation 9/11 used both: 1) thermonuclear advanced and secretive technology to destroy the under-infrastructure of the 9/11 WTC towers while using 2) super-thermate to bringing them down in the opposite direction."

[danp5648]

@biosemiotician thank you I will try and research this. Please review my last video watch?v=Dd5RZJ2AVsc on WTC 7 thanks

[biosemiotician]

@danp5648 Thank you very much for your hard work on this! In the research related to the extremely high energy required to bring down those WTC towers, there is "A 9/11 under-reported phenomenon", "the 40ft ‘pothole’" "If you look at the left side of the crater’s picture you will see the 9/11 WTC “manhatite” radioactive glass, product of radiation." Check it at Google images: 40ft pothole 9/11 WTC

@vomisacaasi Architect Bart Voorsanger called it that way as well as Brian Williams, NBC anchor.

[danp5648]

@vomisacaasi It could be however I got bad intelligence on the whole subject. How it was made? I belief "they" the outside world thinks pressure made the objects

The exhibit and Rocks that you referred to in your e-mail are part of a permanent exhibit in the museum. They will not be leaving the museum.

Sincerely,

Paul Statler

Manager, Visitor Services

pstatler@nycpm.org

(212) 480-3100, Ext. 102

FAX: (212) 480-9757

[vomisacaasi]

@danp5648 It could be because non calls it a meteorite but the media or more accurately, youtubers. No one in the interviews media or spokes people call it that. The paper they show in the video does not call it that.

Just because you call it that does and they said it was not there does not mean it was not there. You need to ask the right questions.