Upload

Loading icon Loading...

This video is unavailable.

The Proper Forum (Part 4 of 9) - The Rule of Law and the Global War on Terrorism - Washburn Law

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Washburnlaw's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Washburnlaw's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Washburnlaw's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Apr 19, 2009

Subtitle: Military Commissions or Other Alternatives? On November 13, 2001, President Bush ordered the detention of suspected terrorists subject to trial by military commission. After the Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that the President lacked authority to unilaterally establish military commissions, Congress enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2006, effectively endorsing the use of military tribunals to try detainees. In Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), the Supreme Court held that the military commissions established by Congress are not a sufficient substitute for the constitutional right of habeas corpus. Panelists discuss the fate of military commissions in light of Boumdiene, and explore other alternatives for adjudicating detainees. Moderator: David J. R. Frakt. Panelists: Amos Guiora, Gabor Rona, Samuel V. Jones. For more information visit: http://washburnlaw.edu/ruleoflaw/

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading...
Working...
to add this to Watch Later

Add to