Who Wins the Caucuses?

Michael Shure gives his prediction on who will win the Iowa Caucuses. Shure also gives his winners and losers of the year in Politics.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Politics
• Mitt Romney
• Chris Christie
• Herman Cain
• Anthony Weiner
• Michele Bachmann
• Ron Paul
• Iowa Caucuses
• Iowa Caucus
• Newt Gingrich
• Tim Pawlenty
• Rick Santorum
• News
• Analysis
• President
• Obama
• Barack Obama
• Republican
• Democrat
• Election
• Poll
• Polls
• Talk
• Discussion
• Michael Shure
• TYT
• twenTYTwelve

[mybroisavirgin]

even though I disagree with Ron Paul on many issues, I really want him to beat Obama

[IamYoddle]

I predict somebody will be loosing 1,000 dollars....

[IamYoddle]

@BrotherAlpha earmarks are good, you know where the money is going. Things like tarp have no earmarks, we have no idea where the money is going. He gets his district back the money, away from the government that spends it on wars.

He wouldn't continue the wars, he is against the private contractors we have their. Letters of Marquee is allowed under the constitution and is a good way to capture pirates or terrorist cheaply, without US troops dying and was used by the founders.

[BrotherAlpha]

@IamYoddle Ron Paul asked for more earmarks than most congressmen, even though he campaigns against them.

He also wanted to give the president the ability to raise private armies and give Letters of Marquee to private captains. He would continue the wars, he would just privatize them.

He's scary. He does have one or two good idea (end the drug war, he would improve privacy in some areas) but he has a lot of crackpot ones as well.

[fridginators]

Hahaha oh Michael, Santorum 6%. Oh well, you made this prediction four days early, but still, lol.

[Johntkr]

@Sahluful Iowa is a stepping stone that by itself is inconclusive. Albeit, like most subjects of study, when combined with other events it is relevant. Meaning if Paul was given a fair chance by the media, he probably would not only have won Iowa, but have even more success in general. So you are right about Iowa by itself, but reiterate that it is relevant when combined with other events; like the SAT alone or grades alone vs combined. People like us can help make the media honest.

Cheers!

[Sahluful]

Michael, if Romney wins the presidency, we have you to blame for it.

[Sahluful]

@Johntkr However, since Iowa is irrelevant, Romney winning the caucus means that he won't win the nomination.

[Johntkr]

@Sahluful Michael, along with general media poised Romney as the likely winner, which directed him votes in the process. So Michael, along with general media cannot be right about their predictions like who will be the number one tennis player in the world. They can be right like pawns to the oligarchy who shape views, rather than report everyday peoples' political perspectives.

[IamYoddle]

@AngeliqueStP ???

[Sahluful]

@Johntkr Michael was confident to the point of arrogant about Paul losing and Romney winning, which is why I was annoyed that he turned out to be right.

[Sahluful]

@jesushatesyoutoo That was before the final results were tallied.