Harvard cell biology

Im sorry its just so hard to resist. If its UFO believers, racists, anarchists,fundies, republicans, creationist or holocaust deniers... I just cant help myself.

Silly boy. pray for divine knowledge

plz wiki. paradigm

I KNOW THERE ISN'T DECIDING! Can't you understand a caustic comment when you see one? It's kind of silly to say that some organ system that has a specific purpose just came together one fine day or over a millenia. EG, joints. How did cells know that their "arms" should bend? If there is purpose, then it must have been created.

Oh, dont forget. It's the same "scientists" that came up with spontaneous generation to "debunk" Theists.

Its not me who think it "just came together one fine day" or seven.

Christianity adopted spontaneous generation like alot of Aristotelic biology. It was disproved with Pasteurs experiments and seems ridiculous now because of the vast evidence supporting the theory of evolution. After this, creationist dont seem to support any scientific theory.

When you your theories are built on a creator that is neither provable nor unprovable, you really dont get any progress.

No, you think wrong, the belief is that man was created, not that he came together.

Also, no it was the atheists who adopted spontaneous generation as the means of the creation of life. Why would Christians adopt a theory that disproved their own? Plus Pasteur himself was a Christian. And sir, we do support theories, such as of gravity, relativity, etc. just not the garbage that atheists create.

Lastly, can you prove your theory? Can you truly verify it with your senses? Didn't think so.

You dont seem to understand where your theory is standing, evolution explains the diverisity and specialisation of species to a much greater extent than any other. It is you that have to prove your theory?

But a complete verification is not possible, one of the keystones in science is doubt, when a theory is neither provable nor unprovable it is no longer science.Can you truly verify anything with your senses?

Wrong again brah, science is all about what is observable, empirical; doubt has nothing to do with it. See, your explanation that all life comes from a single ancestor is neither provable or unprovable, just as the theory that a designer made life with purpose is also. What were getting into here is "philosophy", not science.

And yes, I can verify many things with my senses, just as I am verifying what I am typing right now (self-reference). Easy-peasy lemon-squeezy.

good thing we dont mix religion with science then...

but there is alot of philosophy behind science?see: Hypothetico-deductive model. For the doubt part you could probably see: Descartes, or the matrix movie...

Evolution has unlike creationism, stood the test of time. All major discoveries within biology and paleontology have strenghtened it. While those that still cling to creationism have had to make a new ad hoc hypothesis for all of them.

I must say that you need to learn to use English correctly, it's difficult to understand what you're saying.

I comprehend all those things you listed for me to look up, so I'm not as much of a tard as you have pre-supposed that I am.

There isn't any philosophy behind science. For instance, the age old question "Why is there something instead of nothing?", can not be answered with scientific fact.

Mixing the two is a mistake, and only a fool would assimilate them and call it "science".