Kalyan Rishi tells Alexander why his quest is futile

A clip from the series 'Chanakya' where an ascteic shows Alexander why his quest for world domination, never can be complete.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Chanakya
• Hindu
• Rishi
• india
• alexander

[indrajeet]

@Zeno1999 Very true - sanskrit is the oldest and purest language.

[gkgenius]

If he does so, then he will be "stuck" with his life (because he can't move his feet!). All his freedom will go and what's life without freedom and peace?

[gharwas513]

CHANKYA WAS A GREAT BHRAMIN .I ADMIRE HIM A LOT

[9senapati]

@kalkibhagwan 100 chanakyas will fight each other till the world is destroyed

[kalkibhagwan]

we need a Chanakya in this century.. that too atleat 100 

[Zeno1999]

@MrLantean < Thanks for sharing; closest to Sanskrit is also a dialect of Hindi that is spoken in Mr. BR Chopra's Mahabharata and Shri Sagar's Ramayana series and I think this dialect has beautiful and peaceful attributes.

Revival of any indigenous language would bring back some of the ancient wisdom which we need today and such projects are successful in small villages as large cities look at these as backward step.

[MrLantean]

@Zeno1999 In India, there are a number of village communities that use Sanskrit as a daily spoken language. There has been programs sponsored by the Indian government to revive the use of Sanskrit as a daily spoken rather than restricting it as a lithurgical language. According to the census in 1991, there are at least 50,000 fluent speakers of Sanskrit.

[RainCastle88]

good example...

[Zeno1999]

@82abhilash < All languages have come out of Sanskrit especially Europeans ones. Where does Sanskrit still taught ? Paper existed in both India and China first, both countries are way older than what is acknowledged by the historians. Their immortal philosophies : S.Dharma/Taoism is the best.

[nkdbishnoi]

@LordPranav in that case bro no one for whom this was intended (local audiences, who understands hindi, & to some extent English) would have understood .......... & the whole production would have been to no use :)

[82abhilash]

@vimawa How do you know that I have to seen papyrus? Why is seeing it in any way relevant when discussing about the supposed person who invented it? If seeing is that important I can also give such stupid arguments, like this - 'I am being lectured by the guy who has not even seen the inventor of papyrus.'

I do not know who invented zero or who made up the ARYAN invasion theory. Do you have a point?