9/11 - The Jane Standley / BBC WTC7 Incident Explained

I just thought I would add a little more to the BBC's explanation of the early report of World Trade Center 7's collapse.

The BBC's explanation is from the documentary "Conspiracy Files - The Third Tower":
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9072062020229593250&ei=c5ERSvCuMo...

Sources for the quotes:

Lieutenant William Ryan:
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110117.PDF

Deputy Chief Peter Hayden:
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html

Chief Daniel Nigro:
http://911guide.googlepages.com/danielnigro


The news clips are from archive.org (The following times are approximate)

The BBC incident:
4:57 and 5:08 pm (The 5:08 clip is the one in this video)

Other Misreports:

ABC - 9:55 am - 9/11
NBC - 10:24 am - 9/11
CNN - 9:45 am - 9/11
CBS - 2:13 pm - 9/12
FOX - 8:51 pm - 9/12

There were more misreports, but I thought I would include the more obvious ones, and I can't guarantee that I caught them all.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• jane
• standley
• bbc
• wtc7
• world
• trade
• center

[LeeboProductions]

I guess its just a coincidence then that WTC 7 was the first steel structured bulding to have collapsed in the WORLD, EVER!!!! due to fire?? (at free fall speed for aprox 2.5 seconds NIST has now confirmed this in part btw) So my point is how would people expect it to collapse if one never has due to fire?? and guess what strange that it did... due to fire... yeah right!!!

[WideAsleep22]

@rocket1039 "Project for the New American Century" controversial 90-page report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century. Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" Ruin America as we know it

[ladbroke8]

@ctcole77

i heard it was only 87% they found of the plane but then again weve yet to see 1% and we cannot trust the source. 95% is a psychologically satisfying number whuch is why debunkers use it.

Nist have shown that tower 7 fell for over 2 seconds at freefall but they never reviewed their conclusions so the memo never reached you. Then again it didnt have to.

[ctcole77]

TOP FIVE 911 TWOOFER LIES

1) Nanothermite (aka paint chips from PPG)

2) No flight 93 (despite 95% of plane debris recovered)

3) No flight 77 (even though over 130 witnesses saw a plane)

4) Marvin Bush WTC security (never happened)

5) Free fall speed (absolutely no building collapsed at freefall speed)

[lawsonsmart]

100% INSIDE JOB..for sure.

[rnsone]

@911FullContext:so who do u work for Mossad or CIA?

[snakeskin2u2]

Steel-frame buildings may only "collapse" with the steel when the foundations have failed or moved and caused the whole building to topple over.

The building cannot lose it's frame at the same time.

The BBC live transmission clearly shows that 9/11 was pre-scripted = controlled.

[snakeskin2u2]

The conspiracy theory about cave-dwellers, terrorists and hijacked non-existent planes does not hold up to examination.

[snakeskin2u2]

In order for a steel frame building to be "expected to collapse" it firstly has to be totally gutted.

However, this would not affect the steel structure to any great degree and that oart of the building would be left remaining after the collapse.

It was not - but fell vertically.

Therefore the steel structure was subjected to controlled demolition

[snakeskin2u2]

The "get out " excuse given by the BBC blaming Reuters (who had wrongly timed the release) does not wash because,

1) The WTC7 "collapse" report was shown to be around 1 hour prior to the demolition, indicating that they forgot about daylight savings time, and therefore the script was written prior to the day.

2) A steel frame building cannot "be expected" to collapse.

3) The full reasons given for the "collapse" could not possibly have been known unless pre-scripted = controlled