Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Beamship Variation V Outdoor Test

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,597
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 26, 2007

The five-footer tested outside with the GAMMA HIGH-VOLTAGE RESEARCH commercial-grade, 60-Watt power-supply (40KV @ 1.5 milliAmps). To the Moon, Alice!

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The way Nicola Tesla made these things was with short positive pulses at high frequency and voltage (20 kHz to 100+ kHz), in the direction of thrust, and a high frequency AC on the plate/hull on the aft of the vehicle, both relative to an internal frame, Tesla claimed 300 Miles/sec top speed.

    See books by William Lyne for more info, namely "Occult Ether physics" .. he's a bit cynical thus the word 'Occult'.

  • @Beamshipcaptain That may be and even seems likely, but has anyone TRIED these variations?

    From my POV dismissing someone like that and not even verifying such a simple variation makes your methodology as bad as those who dismiss your work as some kind of hoax or fantasy.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Twelve roller mock up of the SEG
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Beamshipcaptain Yes, I have the PDF. I have heard of subquantum kinetics, but never looked into it. I will check it out. Thanks again.

  • @aerospike00 Ion wind is incapable of causing levitation of even a 5 gram model by over three ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE! Google: FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR.

  • @aerospike00 Its subquantum kinetics (google it). Its artificial gravity. Its a warp drive, and has no inertia or G-forces. Its been classified from 1955 to 1995, and the lid is still being attempted to be clamped down, in spitde of patents issued.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Agreed. It's just that in many circle, they constantly want simply blow this off as an ion wind effect. I really do believe it's much more than that. Thanks for your response.

  • @aerospike00 TT Brown's experiments in Paris in 1955, North Carolina at AH Banson labs in 1956-58, and King of Prussia PA 1959, and Takaaki Musha and Honda R&D 1996-2007 show this tech works better in a HARD VACUUM. John Fiala proved my Beamship models still fly in vacuum several years ago, high energy electrostatics WORKS IN VACUUM. If it did,t we wold'nt have VACUUM TUBES, RADAR, RADIO, and TELEVISION!

  • @Beamshipcaptain I built a model of the Lifter as well, but without much success. I saw that they allegedly did a test with it in a vacuum and it appeared to move. Later it was attributed to a few molecules of air bouncing off the wall of the chamber that interacted with the rotators. Is that possible? I hope this test to can be reproduced elsewhere to iron out any possible pedestrian explanation. We need a paradigm shift from what we know now if we are to proceed further.

  • @Charlesincharge42 Yes, they have all been tried from 80 years ago to today. Read about them. Many have been posted, EVEN on YouTube. Thank goodness for the internet! The age of information...

  • @robrob555 Mythbusters are largely full of crap. And to a degree so is Penn and Teller's Bullshit.

    They should be discredited on each others shows.

  • @Charlesincharge42 William Lyne is a self-aggrandizing Know-it all crank. He is a sad personage.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more