Noam Chomsky on the BBC Interviewed by Tim Sebastian 3/3

Noam Chomsky appearing on Hardtalk with Tim Sebastian.

www.chomsky.info
www.zmag.org

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Noam
• Chomsky
• BBC
• Sebastian
• Hardtalk
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• war
• terrorism
• invasion

[artemis7114]

Chomsky is a highly skilled individual has the ability to see a topic from multiple perspectives at the same time and can answer an interviewer spot-on as a result every time. He's always 5 steps ahead of an interviewer. An incredible listener not a selective one; deductive over inductive.

[poop121]

he can also accurately cite an extremely wide range of information off of the top of his head.

[drydust999]

@LogicPunch My lols, your numbers come from propagandists on yahoo answer.

Now think; just the 3000 ppl that are dead on 911 represent more than 99.99% of ppl dead of terrorism in America in the last 10 years. If you include Europe, numbers a practically the same—as Madrid and London were the deadliest attacks on the continent in the same period.

The ppl you mention think that American soldiers killing Iraqi and afghan soldiers are terrorists—that's wrong, and it biases the numbers drastically.

[LogicPunch]

@drydust999

"99.7% of terrorists are muslims (according to 2010 FBI sources)"

Rubbish. Where did you pull that statistic from?

It's actually 6%, and that's according to the FBI database.

[drydust999]

@JJbubbs23 Lol if you're in the domain you domain you know chomsky's shit has never, ever been proven empirically in 50 years, quite the contrary.

When you speak unproven shit for 50 years and you're more like the head of a church than an academic, then you're a fraud. Case made.

In fact there's much more than 1 million muzz terrorists. Anyone who follows this system a little bit rigorously is compelled to murdering the infidels, hence a terrorist. Second case made.

[JJbubbs23]

@drydust999 What evidence? Educating Eve by Geoffrey Sampson that fraud who's been exposed over and over again. That book is an argument against Chomsky's linguistics not his political positions, so how is this relevant. 99.7% Muslims are terrorists, there is around 1 billion Muslims in the world your telling me there is almost 1 billion terrorists.

[drydust999]

@JJbubbs23 Evidence right below in my last comment—your laughter sounds terribly forced.

[JJbubbs23]

@drydust999 Yeah that's right lets believe the FBI. LOL You lost credibility right there. Now this is getting pathetic, you post like 10 comments yet no evidence. I'm not going to respond until you give evidence. Chomsky is wrong but your right nice argument. LMAO

[drydust999]

@JJbubbs23 PS. 99.7% of terrorists are muslims (according to 2010 FBI sources), but you're right I might be generalising by saying that ALL muslims are terrorists. LOL

[drydust999]

@JJbubbs23 "Educating Eve" by Geoffrey Sampson should give you a good summary of why chomsky is all wrong on every level.

I'm denying his truth by insulting? haha that's a good one, especially since you're the one with no other argument than a patronising attitude. Pathetic, but usual for a leftish zombie.

[JJbubbs23]

@drydust999 Gross generalizations, only muslims use terrorism don't you think that is a gross generalization. LOL You can't even prove Chomsky is wrong give me some facts a source something dude. You know Chomsky is speaking the truth that's why all you can do is revert to name calling and insults. I would dare you to debate Chomsky you would be just like Tim Sebastian out of his league. LMAO

[drydust999]

@JJbubbs23 My lols, you're overusing the term terrorism by applying to anything that's bad, without discrimination. You couldn't be less accurate and more wrong; I think it is you who needs some more political maturity before you make gross generalisations; but chomsky surely is no good influence on that front.