Onda VX797HD Monster 7.0 'Portable' MP4 Player - High Res Player

The Onda VX797HD is one huge player, with a large 7.0" hi res screen (800x480), along with the powerful CC1600 chip, allowing for high video resolution playback.

The VX797 is really meant for video playback, but there are other third party programs that could benefit from being used on a large 7.0" screen.

Visit our store at http://www.mp4nation.net

Discuss on our forums at http://www.mp4nation.net/forum

Stay up to date on Chinese media player news on our blog at http://www.mp4nation.net/blog

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Onda
• VX797HD
• CC1600
• MP4
• Player

[doujindance]

unenable mp4 file?

[wrathpsp]

thats what my wife said =]

[Predescu1994]

salut vezi ca mp4 asta are cam jumate de kg si e bun doar sa te uiti la filme hd pe el + adusu din america costa in jur de 10 milioane ; deci nu se merita ! daca vrei un mp4 special iatzi onda vx525 e touchscreen si are 8 gb memorie interna citeste card micro sd muzica filme poze la care le dai zoom pe ecran ca la ipod etc . cel mai important e ca merg jocurile flash ! te joci pe el ca pe net ! daca vrei mai multe detalii da-mi replay

[vargyna]

Yes, of course.

[danyyydanyyy2009]

Vreau si eu acest player,in Romania nu se poate returna?ca eu nu pot cumpara de pe internet,nu am nici cont paypal,in Romania in ce market pot gasi acest mp4?vreau sa-mi iau si eu unul,astept raspuns

[joeby13]

do these work in the uk ???

[nintendude7cubed]

This player would make a heck of a sleek MID.

Why make a microSD slot as well? I don't mean to be picky, but since this player is so monstrous, you would only need a regular sd slot, heck you could even get away with a CF card on this giant.

[2BunnyReturns]

Well, I have a crappy camera (for video, it takes nice still pictures, a Nikon Coolpix S2), and it takes videos in progressive, even though they are only 640 by 480 maximum at 15 frames per second.

Yeah, kinda like that.

[wongsmokesbong]

that is true, however mst camcorders record interlaced (the very expensive ones an som moderately expensive ones record progressive). So, if he got a cheap camera, it would have a lower resolution, but be progressive, while if he used this camera, it'd be higher resolution but interlaced (which you can deinterlace to get slightly lower quality progressive video). I agree that you can't get the information back, but the de-interlacing setup will overall have better video than the previous camera.

[2BunnyReturns]

But, how can you "de interlace" something if the lack of video in the "interlace area" was never there to begin with?