Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (3,605)
-
I might leave Unity for CryEngine..... Only thing is the asset pipeline Unit has to offer.... Especially Blender support
-
@wemakepies They aren't getting more realistic graphics cards than the earth. They are simply better looking.
-
Minecraft has the best graphics!
-
@dragonxanimation That's why I said 'Scripted' ;)
Check on the CryDEV Wiki. Exact simple instructions for lag-free scripted physics.
-
@PhysicsTowerTeam because crysis realtime super physics destruction on ultra = super lag if you don't have a 3000 rig....
-
i can see now why crysis has so amazing graphics
-
WW2 FPS "Enemy front" will run on CE3.
-
@SuperFunnyman001 Game play mechanics are also based on the developer. They can code them. You don't need a specific engine. Again, this is based on the developer.
Doom Engine: It isn't technically a 3-D engine. But if someone could be nifty, they could create Far Cry 3 Environments, if they modify the code and put in high res textures. Also, graphics shouldn't be a priority--development and costs are.
Also, I mean't "I don't think I understand you clearly". I forgot to put that in.
-
@PhysicsTowerTeam I don't know why you'll telling me this, cause I know it >.< But devs choose engines by the gameplay mechanics available to the engine, which is why SDKs like UDK and Source are becomming more and more popular.
If anything can be rendered in any engine, are you telling me someone could create Far Cry 3 visuals on the old Doom engine? No.
@Iboshido CryENGINE 3 already has the power of destruction. FB2 uses mostly scripted destruction anyway, so it's possible in CE3. It's just CryTEK never really showed use, or attempted to show the possibility of destruction. But, it's totally possible. Even in CE2, it was possible but CryTEK didn't try to implement a system into Crysis 1.
I hate it when people judge the game engine by the GAME. :)
PhysicsTowerTeam 1 month ago 26
How are computers getting better graphics cards than the EARTH?
wemakepies 4 weeks ago 7