It could have been a plane that hit the pentagon.....a plane of some sort....possibly a U2 Spy Plane. It's large enough to confuse people travelling at super-high speeds, it could have been "decorated" with American Airlines logo and whatnot. The damage would seem to be sufficent with the impact of a U2 Spy Plane. If you look closely in the video, you can see something that resembles a small aircraft with a similar end "tail" attached to it. But definatley not Flight 77.
"MICHAEL MOORE: ...I've filmed before, down at the Pentagon, before 9/11. There's got to be at least 100 video cameras ringing that building, in the trees, everywhere. They've got that plane coming in with 100 angles. How come we haven't seen the straight—I'm not talking about stop-action photos, I'm talking about the video. I want to see the video, I want to see 100 videos that exist of this. Why don't they want us to see that plane coming into the building?..."
Why is any clip or image of the plane completely cut. I find it very very hard to believe that the camera outside of the pentagon is this poor quality and we have no video of the plane actually crashing into the pentagon.
The plane flew over the Pentagon just after the explosion - it didn't disappear.
Many more witnesses who worked at the Pentagon claim the sound was closer to a blunt explosion coupled with the smell of cordite. Few, if any, workers who heard the blast report sounds that coincide with the long, metallic, chaotic crash of an airliner.
@7Epitaph So you went from no witnesses to zero witneses flying low towards the direction of the Pentagon. Are you suggesting that the plane just diappeared. And yes a couple of the witnesses that worked at the Pentagon did see a plane crash.
You can see the rocket, I think a tomahawk
daspartandude08 2 weeks ago
It could have been a plane that hit the pentagon.....a plane of some sort....possibly a U2 Spy Plane. It's large enough to confuse people travelling at super-high speeds, it could have been "decorated" with American Airlines logo and whatnot. The damage would seem to be sufficent with the impact of a U2 Spy Plane. If you look closely in the video, you can see something that resembles a small aircraft with a similar end "tail" attached to it. But definatley not Flight 77.
00792756 3 weeks ago
"MICHAEL MOORE: ...I've filmed before, down at the Pentagon, before 9/11. There's got to be at least 100 video cameras ringing that building, in the trees, everywhere. They've got that plane coming in with 100 angles. How come we haven't seen the straight—I'm not talking about stop-action photos, I'm talking about the video. I want to see the video, I want to see 100 videos that exist of this. Why don't they want us to see that plane coming into the building?..."
nedgey 3 weeks ago
1:27 missile tip 1:28 missile explosion
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 3 months ago
Why is any clip or image of the plane completely cut. I find it very very hard to believe that the camera outside of the pentagon is this poor quality and we have no video of the plane actually crashing into the pentagon.
BlatantlyBritt 5 months ago
NO NO !!! THERE IS ANOTHER VIDEO ON A DEBUNKER VIDEO OF THE PENTAGAON, TOTALLY DIFFERENT WITH GAS PUMPS IN THE MIDDLE....
PilotDave85 5 months ago
at 1:27 if this Boeing 757-223 then I'm Santa Claus
kerogre256 5 months ago
@godzilla1077
This isn't Kcon83.
The plane flew over the Pentagon just after the explosion - it didn't disappear.
Many more witnesses who worked at the Pentagon claim the sound was closer to a blunt explosion coupled with the smell of cordite. Few, if any, workers who heard the blast report sounds that coincide with the long, metallic, chaotic crash of an airliner.
7Epitaph 7 months ago
@7Epitaph So you went from no witnesses to zero witneses flying low towards the direction of the Pentagon. Are you suggesting that the plane just diappeared. And yes a couple of the witnesses that worked at the Pentagon did see a plane crash.
godzilla1077 7 months ago
@godzilla1077
Of those 133, zero witness the point of impact.
7Epitaph 7 months ago