another rear-end collision - copsatwork.com
Top Comments
All Comments (25)
-
People in the comments say "the cop didn't have his lights on" YEAH RIGHT, in fact, why would you be pulled over by a police officer if he didn't have his lights on?
Idiots.
-
@peterbilt2004 I'd definitely have a memory problem at that point. I have no recollection of that fact Senator.. I can not confirm if the offer had any lighting devices turned on at the time of the incident; I only recall he was still obstructing traffic.
-
@peterbilt2004 no kidding. I'd be like "you dispose of this ticket and i will back you up in court, if not, well, have a nice day trying to witness your own accident"
-
I read some comments and I don't see any reason why the cop should have cut some slack on the female driver. If she hadn't been driving that fast in the first place, she wouldn`t have been pulled over and thus, the accident wouldn't have never happened. The only good thing was that the driver didn't crash elsewhere nor run over an innocent bystander.
-
The woman should have gone to court and said "I didn't see anything, i was too stoned"
-
@DarthJesus2 yes, he does have to list her as a witness, but he could have let her go on the speeding ticket
-
day moine?
-
@BRAVOADD and then you would get in the shit hole for saying that because the minor fact YOU would be LIEING in court after being sworn into tell the truth.
-
@themooseisontheloose Kinda hard not to since theres a camera in the car, I'd laugh for hours if she said nothing was on, on his car .... After being Sworn into tell the truth lmao...
Yeah, she gets a speeding ticket and is supposed to serve as a witness with no deal? Phuck you cop.
peterbilt2004 2 years ago 9
hey it works both ways, you wanna use me as a witness, and give me a ticket? i didnt see shit you didnt have any lights on as far as im concerned, its called A DEAL, which if the girl had any brains, would have made.
KinetikPlayground 2 years ago 7