WTC Building 7 Collapse Compared with Controlled Demolitions

WTC Building 7 Collapse Compared with Controlled Demolitions

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911Building
• 7
• Collapse
• Demolition

[cbranje]

of disaster. I believe an order to bring the buildings down was given, Larry Silverstein said it himself, and to shoot down Flight 93. Everything else probably happened as we were told.

[cbranje]

I made this video quite a few years ago when I was much younger. I'm not nearly as strong in my convictions about this day as I was back then. For one, the inability of the Bush admin to plant WMD in Iraq places serious doubt on their ability conspire to create an event like 9/11. As a student of science (structural engineer is not my specialty admittedly) the way the three buildings fell just raises suspicion for me. I believe their were pre-wired for controlled collapse for just this sort

[munkydotorg]

Or you can believe what this dimbo wants you too.. How about a little sound, and a little bit more truth. More than just fire was involved.

[cbranje]

@munkydotorg

Ok then, tell us what else was involved?

[cbranje]

Heres what I don't get, the planes hit near the 80th floor.

Why would the all the floors from 110 to 0 be obliterated into dust?

Why would building 7 fall some uniformly. It impossible for that collapse to be caused by random fire.

[ColonelAllan]

lego would have held out better. i don't believe steel turns to matchwood from a couple of small fires...do you?

[KevinMerck]

Obvious controlled demolition.

[megaprinciples]

Yes, I'll believe what I want, and that is the truth. Thanks for the video!

[Ahlywog]

@munkydotorg Maybe so, but NIST's latest Q&A says the fires were sufficient to do the job themselves, without the added damage from the falling debris, despite there being no obvious fires at the onset of collapse. And no amount of fire or damage from debris explains free-fall. An object cannot fall at rates of acceleration reaching gravitational free fall through another object of equal or greater mass. Not possible.

[sharkeeeee]

@munkydotorg You're blind my friend. There were only SMALL fires in the building. Research and understand! THEY LIED TO YOU AND YOU BELIEVED THEM! Go to sleep now, nothing to see here!

[munkydotorg]

allowed them to burn for a while, then do a controlled demolition in the exact opposite method that anyone has ever successfully done. To top it off they even go their timing dead on the money on towers 1 and 2, continuously blowing out floor by floor in perfect sync with the building falling, yet none of this had ever been even attempted before. I think we are giving too much credit to government intelligence, and to the govn'ts hired demo team

[munkydotorg]

or we could look at the other side. Say the government conspired to do this, by any means. Ignoring the engineering and physics and all. Basically we are saying the same government, who failed to overthrow castro, failed to overthrow chavez, and failed to "find" wmd in iraq, also was capable of pulling off such an incredibly complex mission. If WTC 1 & 2 were controlled demolitions, it would've been the first time anyone had ever crashed a large airplane into two 110 story buildings,